Hi, I am looking for some advice for my friend, he has had a rejection letter from M&S on his claim for miss selling.
I have a copy of his application form, and it is one of those that you ticked if you did not want it this is in 1988.
Now my friend is the first to admit he did not even look at statements did not realise he even had PPI,which is a real shame as he could have claimed on policy when he lost his business and not file for bankruptcy. He had PPI on several loans and credit cards and did not realise on any of them.
Now M&S knew he was in financial difficulties and never once advised claiming on the PPI policy.
Does anyone have any advice for me to continue his claim, I have claimed back successfully from some of the other cards for him, with the refunds going directly to pay the debt off, which is only right, he is not asking for cash for defaulting on his responsibilities, but IF he had known or even realised he had PPI he would have a) claimed and the debt paid off or b) if mis selling proved could have paid the debt of that way.
In my original complaint to them, I had cited that my friend was Self employed and the policy was not suitable for him and also he did not even know he had it, which has been upheld with nat west/ rbs.
Thanks Deb
I have a copy of his application form, and it is one of those that you ticked if you did not want it this is in 1988.
Now my friend is the first to admit he did not even look at statements did not realise he even had PPI,which is a real shame as he could have claimed on policy when he lost his business and not file for bankruptcy. He had PPI on several loans and credit cards and did not realise on any of them.
Now M&S knew he was in financial difficulties and never once advised claiming on the PPI policy.
Does anyone have any advice for me to continue his claim, I have claimed back successfully from some of the other cards for him, with the refunds going directly to pay the debt off, which is only right, he is not asking for cash for defaulting on his responsibilities, but IF he had known or even realised he had PPI he would have a) claimed and the debt paid off or b) if mis selling proved could have paid the debt of that way.
In my original complaint to them, I had cited that my friend was Self employed and the policy was not suitable for him and also he did not even know he had it, which has been upheld with nat west/ rbs.
Thanks Deb



Sorry to intrude but can you clarify whether this store card opened in 1998 was eventually substituted with a MasterCard in 2003/4. The legal issues may change (in a good way 
From the point of view of credit worthiness, bankruptcy is much more serious than any defaults or even a CCJ, why would he care whether a default shows as settled or not? It won't make much difference. :nono: By the time the BR drops off the default should also have been dropped off, 6 years after it was recorded. Defaults drop off regardless of having been settled or not. :thumb:
Comment