Re: Calculating PPI on Credit Cards
Hi Maxedoutman,
Yep got the letters thank you.
Tesco have calculated the refunds basically in line with the methods that would normally be imposed upon them by the FOS for this type of PPI policy.
If you were to have pursued matters through the FOS ( as you did for your Lloyds claim ) then the level of redress offered by Tesco is the maximum that the FOS would consider you are due, with the exception of an additional amount to cover distress and inconvenience etc. We obviously do not want to argue the general matter of redress with the FOS !!. (well not at this point or in respect of your claim anyway )
In the case of your Tesco claim they have admitted the mis-selling of your PPI policy, FOS are not involved so it is up to you and Tesco to argue / agree the amount of redress.
So the question is as to whether the method Tesco have used is an acceptable measure of the redress that should be offered to you in respect of mis-sold PPI policy of this type.
What Tesco have offered you is as follows -
1) A refund of all the individual monthly ppi premiums that you paid.
2) An amount to reflect the estimate of the share of the monthly interest that you paid across to them in respect of those individual PPI monthly premiums. They have calculated this on a cumulative basis from the date of each individual monthly premium up until you cleared the total balance on the account ( and stopped paying them any interest ).
3) Compensatory interest (based on 8% simple interest per annum ) in respect of any periods where a recalculation of the outstanding balance on your account ( after taking out the PPI and estimated debited interest ) would have left the account in a positive ( credit situation. Now that didn't happen until you totally cleared the balance on the account so they have just offered to pay you the compensatory interest from that point onwards ( on what your credit balance would have actually been if you hadn't paid the PPI premiums and associated debited interest ).
4) They haven't offered you an additional amount for distress and inconvenience.
Bills spreadsheet calculates (1) and (2) above virtually exactly the same way as Tescos have done. However Bills spreadsheet calculates (3) the compensatory interest not just from when your account would have been in a credit situation but from the date of each individual ppi premium and amount of associated debit interest through to the present day. The difference ( as Bill suggests ) is about £230.
I shall pause here in case you have any questions. ( Plus I need to eat !!!!)
Next post will cover how I feel a court would deal with the matter of redress were they handling matters and my own personal opinions. Neither of which are particularly relevant because presently the matter is, as I have said above, to be settled between you and Tesco.
Hi Maxedoutman,
Yep got the letters thank you.
Tesco have calculated the refunds basically in line with the methods that would normally be imposed upon them by the FOS for this type of PPI policy.
If you were to have pursued matters through the FOS ( as you did for your Lloyds claim ) then the level of redress offered by Tesco is the maximum that the FOS would consider you are due, with the exception of an additional amount to cover distress and inconvenience etc. We obviously do not want to argue the general matter of redress with the FOS !!. (well not at this point or in respect of your claim anyway )
In the case of your Tesco claim they have admitted the mis-selling of your PPI policy, FOS are not involved so it is up to you and Tesco to argue / agree the amount of redress.
So the question is as to whether the method Tesco have used is an acceptable measure of the redress that should be offered to you in respect of mis-sold PPI policy of this type.
What Tesco have offered you is as follows -
1) A refund of all the individual monthly ppi premiums that you paid.
2) An amount to reflect the estimate of the share of the monthly interest that you paid across to them in respect of those individual PPI monthly premiums. They have calculated this on a cumulative basis from the date of each individual monthly premium up until you cleared the total balance on the account ( and stopped paying them any interest ).
3) Compensatory interest (based on 8% simple interest per annum ) in respect of any periods where a recalculation of the outstanding balance on your account ( after taking out the PPI and estimated debited interest ) would have left the account in a positive ( credit situation. Now that didn't happen until you totally cleared the balance on the account so they have just offered to pay you the compensatory interest from that point onwards ( on what your credit balance would have actually been if you hadn't paid the PPI premiums and associated debited interest ).
4) They haven't offered you an additional amount for distress and inconvenience.
Bills spreadsheet calculates (1) and (2) above virtually exactly the same way as Tescos have done. However Bills spreadsheet calculates (3) the compensatory interest not just from when your account would have been in a credit situation but from the date of each individual ppi premium and amount of associated debit interest through to the present day. The difference ( as Bill suggests ) is about £230.
I shall pause here in case you have any questions. ( Plus I need to eat !!!!)
Next post will cover how I feel a court would deal with the matter of redress were they handling matters and my own personal opinions. Neither of which are particularly relevant because presently the matter is, as I have said above, to be settled between you and Tesco.
Comment