• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

new PPI ruling - The Doran Case

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • new PPI ruling - The Doran Case

    This has overruled the plevin case-which stated that you get back commissions >50%
    the new Doran case is you get all the commission back
    https://www.theguardian.com/money/20...ter-ppi-ruling

    UK banks could face new multibillion-pound claims after PPI ruling
    Court ruling over mis-selling may allow cases that have been rejected to be reconsidered

    Patrick Collinson and Miles Brignall

    Mon 2 Jul 2018 19.47 BST Last modified on Tue 3 Jul 2018 11.44 BST
    This article is over 2 months old
    Shares
    402
    High street banks
    Banks relied on a 29 August 2019 ‘time-bar’ on claims, agreed with the FCA, as a way to cap the final cost in the biggest compensation exercise in UK financial history. Photograph: Bloomberg via Getty Images
    Britain’s banks face the threat of a huge new PPI bill that could add billions of pounds to the £30bn already paid out in compensation, following a court ruling lauded by claims management companies as “hugely significant”.

    The case opens the door to a renewed claims bonanza as it suggests that even if the PPI policy was not mis-sold, the buyer may still be able to reclaim because the scale of the commissions paid were excessively high.

    While the ruling does not mean any more cash for people who have already received compensation, it may allow cases that have been rejected to be reconsidered. The ruling is likely to be appealed against but if it stands it presents a fresh PPI nightmare for Britain’s banks, after one claims expert said new payments could run into the tens of billions. Lloyds Bank has so far paid out £18.8bn for mis-selling claims, while Barclays has paid more than £9bn and RBS nearly £5bn.

    Advertisement

    Banks have been relying on a 29 August 2019 “time-bar” on claims, agreed with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), as a way to cap the final cost of what has been the biggest compensation exercise in UK financial history. However, the new ruling threatens further large payouts.

    The case at Manchester county court, involving a couple, Christopher and Joanne Doran, against Paragon Personal Finance, revolved around the issue of commission paid.

    Since October 2017, banks have been told to adopt FCA guidance that followed a court ruling known as “Plevin” when dealing with PPI claims. Under the Plevin rule, if more than 50% of a consumer’s PPI’s payments went as commission and this was not explained to them at the time, they could claim back payments above that threshold, plus interest.


    Business Today: sign up for a morning shot of financial news
    Read more
    The average commission banks were paid was 67%, meaning millions more people sold PPI were entitled to money back.

    Following the Plevin ruling, claimants who had their original mis-selling claims turned down were able to go back to their loan provider and demand they be re-examined.

    In a ruling on the Doran case, the judge said the entire commission should be repaid plus interest – not only the commission above 50%. In doing so he rejected the FCA’s guidance, leading claims management firms to claim others will be entitled to new, higher payouts.

    “This ruling is hugely significant and sets a new precedent,” Simon Evans, the chief executive of the Alliance of Claims Companies, which represents more than 50 claims firms, said.

    Evans said that in total £50bn was paid by consumers to buy policies across the history of PPI selling. Once interest is added, the total figure is £80bn, he said, and that so far the banks had repaid £30bn. “I’ve seen a figure of £18bn as the extra amount that could be paid out as a result of this ruling,” he said, referring to a Financial Times [paywall] article. “But that might be too conservative. It could be as high as £30bn.”

    The FCA said it did not recognise the £18bn figure. “We have always said that different courts could take a different approach. However, it remains our view that our approach has been fair and appropriate,” said a spokeswoman.

    Paragon Banking Group said it was considering its legal position. A spokesman said: “We believe this decision is at odds with other cases heard recently and does not create a precedent. The Doran case is one of a handful of legacy cases for Paragon and we are considering our position regarding appeal.”

    Anyone who has already received compensation for PPI will not be able to reopen their case or obtain further compensation as they have already had their premiums returned in full.


    Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk
    However, the ruling is likely to increase pressure on the FCA to remove the August 2019 time-bar on future claims. “There is now a compelling argument that the time-bar should be removed,” Evans said.

    Regulators estimate that around 64m PPI policies have been sold. Around 45m of those were sold by banks, worth around £44bn. It is not clear how many of these policies were mis-sold – initial estimates by the FCA were that only three million people were affected – but since then more than 12 million people have received compensation.

    Selling PPI was very profitable for banks. The FCA’s predecessor, the Financial Services Authority, highlighted one PPI policy sold alongside a mortgage that cost the customer £20,838 over the loan term, even though the maximum they could reclaim was £31,000, an illustration of the scale of profits involved that led banks to risk mis-selling.

    • This article was amended on 3 July 2018 because the Financial Conduct Authority’s deadline for PPI complaints is 29 August 2019, not June 2019 as an earlier version said. In addition, the number of PPI policies sold has been amended from 53m, to reflect the most recent estimate of 64m.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    MSE article on it here https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/ne...pi-commission/
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Plevin was a supreme court ruling if I recall correctly so cannot be overruled by county court it's worth bearing in mind
      I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

      If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

      I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

      You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

      Comment


      • #4
        Overruling is not applicable. The circumstances are different. All the supreme court did was say >50% should be given back, It did not comment on whether the whole is under question or whether the relationship was unfair.

        That is why the strength of Doran will not get to appeal. Paragon have pulled out because they know, under pressure from like minded lenders, that it would set a precedent to all commissions to be paid back. If they were confident that the supreme court finding was pursuasive they would have continued to a dead cert win at appeal.

        https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-br...-idUKKBN1ND22D

        anyone know if I can get a transcript of Doran?

        Comment


        • #5
          I'll put the article here in case it gets removed at Reuters:

          BUSINESS NEWS
          NOVEMBER 8, 2018 / 2:45 PM / 23 DAYS AGO Exclusive: Britain's Paragon will not appeal landmark PPI case ruling

          Lawrence White, Sinead Cruise, Emma Rumney
          4 MIN READ
          LONDON (Reuters) - Britain’s Paragon Banking Group (PARA.L) said it will not appeal a ruling forcing it to pay compensation over the mis-selling of a payment protection insurance (PPI) premium, in a key case in Britain’s costliest consumer scandal.

          Paragon’s decision has wide implications for other PPI mis-selling cases because if the lender had appealed to a higher court and lost, that could have set a precedent that could have sparked more lawsuits against banks, lawyers told Reuters.

          PPI was an insurance policy sold widely in Britain and designed to protect consumers who suddenly became unable to repay a loan. However, commissions on the policies were often not properly disclosed or were excessive.

          Britain’s top lenders have paid out around 34 billion pounds ($45 billion) in compensation to customers mis-sold PPI.

          Lloyds Bank alone has so far paid out 18.8 billion pounds in redress, while Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS.L) have paid an aggregate 15 billion pounds.

          Paragon will not appeal the county court ruling against it in the case of Doran versus Paragon Personal Finance Ltd, a spokesman for Paragon said in response to an inquiry from Reuters.

          Paragon’s decision follows behind-the-scenes talks with top British banks on how to avert a wave of new compensation claims linked to commission earned on dubious policies, sources said.

          Three senior sources at top British lenders told Reuters that banks had privately discussed with representatives of Paragon Banking Group the advantages of not appealing the key case to a higher court because that would set a legal precedent.

          The sources declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter.

          Paragon rebutted the notion its decision had been influenced by other institutions.

          “We have neither sought nor indeed received any pressure or advice regarding this case from any other banking institutions, but in any event, we will not be appealing the decision in Doran,” a spokesman for Paragon said.

          The key case involves British couple Christopher and Joanne Doran, who brought a case against Paragon Personal Finance to Manchester County Court in June, after a dispute on the amount of commission they paid out of a 10,500 pounds ($13,844) PPI premium.

          The Dorans said they were unaware that 76 percent of that PPI premium was paid to the broker as commission. The judge ruled that the couple would not have bought the policy if the level of commission had been disclosed.

          Paragon was ordered to pay back the entire 7,985 pounds commission in a judgment that superseded current Financial Conduct Authority guidance, which states that only commission above 50 percent of the total premium paid is unfair.

          Paragon said at the time that it would consider whether to appeal.

          Deutsche Bank raided in money laundering probe

          Claims management companies at the time hailed the ruling as a hugely significant one, that could open the door to PPI customers demanding much higher compensation payouts.

          “Paragon’s worry, if they had appealed, would be that their appeal was dismissed and that Doran would be elevated to a principle which the lower courts were obliged to follow, if the facts were sufficiently similar,” said Elis Gomer, a lawyer with expertise in PPI cases at St John’s Buildings law chambers in Manchester.

          “I can understand why there’d be pressure on them not to try it,” Gomer said.

          Reporting by Lawrence White, Sinead Cruise and Emma Rumney; Editing by Silvia Aloisi and Susan Fenton

          Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
          Working...
          X