• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Alliance And Leicester fined £7m for misselling PPI by phone

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alliance And Leicester fined £7m for misselling PPI by phone

    Alliance and Leicester fined 7 million for mis selling PPI.
    Full details on the FSA web site

  • #2
    Re: Alliance And Leicester

    BBC NEWS | Business | Record fine for PPI mis-selling


    Alliance Leicester to pay £7 million fine for PPI failings

    FSA/PN/115/2008
    7 October 2008
    The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Alliance & Leicester Plc (A&L) £7 million for serious failings in its telephone sales of payment protection insurance (PPI).
    For three years from January 2005 to December 2007 A&L sold approximately 210,000 PPI policies to customers seeking a personal loan at an average price of £1,265, but there was a general failure by advisers to give customers details of the cost of PPI. In addition A&L sought to find reasons to sell PPI without properly considering what customers needed.
    A&L did not make it sufficiently clear that PPI was optional and it trained its staff to put pressure on customers where they queried the inclusion of PPI in their quotation or challenged advisers’ recommendations.
    These failings resulted in unacceptable levels of non-compliant sales and a high risk of unsuitable sales over the three year period.
    Margaret Cole, FSA Director of Enforcement, said:
    “The failings at A&L are the most serious we have found. This is reflected in the record PPI fine. It is very disappointing that after three years of regulation we are still finding serious problems in PPI sales.
    “This case shows that we will continue to step up the action we take when firms do not sell PPI properly. Customers should be able to rely on impartial advice based on their individual needs and demands. It is particularly unacceptable for a firm to train its advisers to put pressure on customers when recommending insurance cover which they have not asked for and may not need. Firms cannot rely on paperwork sent out later as an excuse for unclear or misleading statements given on the telephone.
    “As we said in our recent update on our PPI work, firms must ensure their PPI sales processes are up to the required standards. They must change their behaviour where necessary and if they are either unwilling or unable to sell this product in a compliant way, making sure that customers are treated fairly, they should not be selling it at all.”
    A&L has agreed to implement a substantial and comprehensive customer contact programme, overseen by third party accountants. It will write to all customers who took out policies by telephone in conjunction with an unsecured loan between 14 January 2005 and 31 December 2007 prompting them to review their policy against product information sent to them. It will also review any relevant rejected complaints and claims and has committed to pay redress where appropriate.
    This remedial action has been taken into account by the FSA and has reduced the level of penalty which would otherwise have been imposed on the firm.
    In addition, A&L qualified for a 30% reduction in penalty by settling at an early stage of the FSA's investigation. Were it not for this discount, the FSA would have imposed a financial penalty of £10 million.
    http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/alliance_leicester.pdf

    The FSA has previously taken action against 18 firms over poor PPI selling practices: we have fined Liverpool Victoria Banking Services £840,000, HFC Bank £1.085 million, Regency Mortgage Corporation Limited £56,000, Loans.co.uk £455,000, Redcats (Brands) Limited £270,000, GE Capital Bank £610,000, Capital One Bank (Europe) Plc £175,000 and Land of Leather £210,000, GK Group Limited £51,100, George White Motors Limited £28,000, Park’s of Hamilton (Holdings) Limited £61,600 and £35,000 together for Ringways Garages (Leeds) Limited & Ringways Garages (Doncaster) Limited – and have imposed a public censure on Eastern Western Motor Group Limited and Cathedral Motor Company Limited. Other cases where problems relating to PPI also featured are - Capital Mortgage Connections Limited £17,500, Home and County Mortgages Limited £52,500 and Hadenglen Home Finance Plc (£133,000 for the firm and £49,000 for its chief executive).
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Alliance And Leicester
      1. Any A&L customers with questions concerning their PPI policy can contact A&L as follows:
        • Call into any branch
        • Telephone 0844 5619790 (24 hours a day, 7 days a week)
        • Write to Let’s Work it Out, Alliance & Leicester plc, Carlton Park, Narborough, Leicestershire, LE19 0AL
        • Email letsworkitout@alliance-leicester.co.uk (for security reasons it may not be able to respond via email, therefore please provide a contact telephone number).

      2. 4.19
        By reason of the facts and matters detailed below, the FSA considers that A&L has breached Principle 6 of the FSA’s Principles for Businesses by not making it clear to customers that the PPI was optional, and by using inappropriate sales techniques that put pressure on the customer to accept the recommendation, allied with inappropriately managed adviser inducements, to encourage customers to buy PPI.
      #staysafestayhome

      Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

      Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Alliance And Leicester fined £7m for misselling PPI by phone

        Good stuff. And we should get the Competition Commision's verdict this week when they are expected to reccomend banning the selling of PPI alongside loans.

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X