• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

FCA fines PPC for misleading consumers and banks in first CMC case closed

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FCA fines PPC for misleading consumers and banks in first CMC case closed

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Professional Personal Claims Limited (PPC) £70,000 for misleading consumers through its websites and printed materials.

    https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-re...osed-regulator
    1. Final notice for Professional Personal Claims Limited (PPC)

    FCA Authorisation - https://register.fca.org.uk/ShPo_Fir...X00004P2HaOQAV
    (still Authorised with Temp Permission )

    Website
    www.ppclaims.com

    4.2. Between October 2015 and March 2017, the CMRU received 14 complaints against PPC from clients of PPC and other parties who considered (inter alia) the design and content of the PPC Bank Websites and of PPC's documentation to be misleading.

    4.3. The PPC Bank Websites operated by PPC had the following domain names: www.barclays-ppi.co.uk; www.lloydstsb-ppi.co.uk; www.halifax-ppi.direct; www.rbsppi.direct and www.natwest-ppi.direct. In around 2015-2016, the PPC Bank websites replicated the colour schemes traditionally used by the UK banks whose names appeared in their domain names and prominently displayed the names and logos of these UK banks.

    4.4. Once consumers had supplied their contact details and other information by means of the PPC Bank Websites, PPC posted Claim Forms and other printed material to them. The Claim Forms did not prominently identify PPC as the sender but prominently displayed the names of major UK banks. The Claim Forms collected information from consumers and set out the terms and conditions subject to which PPC would pursue claims for redress for mis-sold PPI on their behalf.

    4.5. It was only after consumers had engaged PPC by signing the Claim Forms and returning them to PPC that consumers received correspondence from PPC which prominently displayed PPC's own name rather than the name of any UK bank.

    4.6. Several of PPC's clients and other consumers complained that they had been misled by the PPC Bank Websites, Claim Forms and other conduct by PPC.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Typical that the first 'case closed' is probably because the banks complained.

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X