Hi,
Sorry it's going to be long. The background is that I am currently unemployed a few months now, so the financial damages start to mount, I start to reach the 3-months magical limit where defaults would be logged. So I try making payments to everyone from JSA (a true trick.) and I get behind on rent at the end of this week for the first time...
this comes in a situation where I could be working (having spent the past 2 months in a burocratic stall thanks to my home country taking their sweet time confirming I am not a criminal) - I have this role since December but could not start as it requires security clearance and finally the paperwork is compiled ready for submission to request it.
However my financials have changed, thanks to the aforementioned in the subject.
In december I had no Defaults, I had 1-month arrears max. Now I am in 2-month arrears on my CC's but maintained - they received payments this month so no Default gets logged there, and they are kept in the loop.... (thumbsup to Barclaycard offering a 30-day hold without any payment required, when I told them I'm waiting for the clearance.)
The aforementioned Quickquid I had an account with since early summer. I ended up in a situation where I couldn't maintain paying back in full (paydayloans - they get bigger and bigger by paid in full...) I asked them to let me pay in installments. They didn't discuss how much I could pay. They told me upfront it's £375/month. I couldn't afford and told them it's too high but they told me that is the only option.
I paid for the first month and failed the second. I got in touch, explaining I failed because I don't have £375 altogether - as I advised previously - and please look into lowering the amount. They said OK, they do instalments of the £375, 6x£60 will have to be paid. BUT - in their "helpful attitude" they refused to address the rest of the £375 instalments. I told them it's impossible this way, as it means the actual payment is £375+£60 next month... how could I pay this if I couldn't pay just £375? They didn't care.
They told me, to have lower instalments on the £375's monthly, I have to FAIL ON ALL £375 INSTALMENTS.
At that point I contacted Lloyds and withdrew the CPA - I did this by canceling the QuickQuid DD online. I advised QQ that I withdrew the CPA. I had no other choice! I can't pay £60 via DD and refuse the £375, it's all or nothing with the DD - and they didn't give me acc number to pay via bank transfer...
QQ debited my card the month after, Lloyds making the mistake of letting it through, but Lloyds reversed for me after I called them and referred to the relevant paragraphs in the relevant acts 2-3x plus told them exactly when were they advised that the CPA is withdrawn. They were so helpful they said they instal an automatic reversal, which they did, in case QQ tried to use my card details.
--- I say DD and CPA - because it was "Card not Present" but in the QQ agreement, and they use card details not acc details so it'd be according to CPA; but QQ logged it under DD on my account enabling me to remove the authority simply by removing the DD. I removed it online and Lloyds accepted that as notice when I talked to them (saying since it was there I considered that as notice... and ever since if I cancel or edit DD/SO, I do online it always works.)
QQ tried using my card, monthly meaning I was in standstill - either I enable them to use my card and they take whatever they wish or I do nothing - which was their own advice!
In the meantime I contacted them in august when it looked I may be able to pay in instalments of about £200 and offered them this. NO RESPONSE AT ALL to my emails.
They just kept charging my card monthly for amounts in the excess between £450-500 monthly.
I received no warnings, contacts or Default notice from them.
Then I was contacted by QQ (in early January) via email that they pass on the debt to ARC. (I can't recall a default notice - if they sent it was an email notice but I believe I got that from elsewhere not from these two.)
I responded to QQ to query why they never reacted to my offer and gave me these advices and also to get some info on their DCA as I had nothing from the DCA. NO RESPONSE except that they passed on the debt. It took a week to get contact details to ARC. I tried to get QQ to look into their "helpful attitude" and nonresponse to my offer, but what I got was they tried to help me! Literally stating this to describe their "cannot pay £375 so must pay £435 and more" - approach.
When I wrote to QQ becaue they sent me useless answers, that OK, they obviously tried to use my card details after CPA withdrawn, they gav me the advice of "get into late payment we only talk to you afterwards" and refused to lower the instalments, and I wihs to receive a final response, then ARC finally emailed me. The ARC email was an initial one "we took over..." and QQ provided a "final response" quickly maintaining they were helpful and did everything correctly. The QQ correspondence died out at this point. They stated I contacted my bank to get back the moneys charged - but it was automatic, as they had no authority and it has been proven to Lloyds so Lloyds didn't let them debit.
They never addressed why they didn't respond to my offer - not a word about it.
Still at this point, early-mid January, no Defaults on my records, QQ maintained payments.
I responded to ARC - 5 TIMES! I actually started tracking the emails by "this is my fourth attempt in response... " "This is my 5th attempt in response...." and so on. I got no response to my emails. I sent the first one nicely, explaining my situation and asking if they could 1) put the account on hold or 2) if not then advise me of a minimum instalment that could be acceptable for them.
After my 5th email and one that stated if they don't respond then the OFT or FOS or whoever governs them will learn about it, I received a long winded response... WITH SOMEONE ELSE'S ACCOUNT NUMBER, NAME AND DEBT AMOUNT!
I responded, stating this and that the email - as confusing as it is - seems to be unrelated to my issue as well.
They resent the SAME email with a red header "Ignore the previous email, this one has the correct details, we confirm we didn't disclose your acc details." - What do they tell the dude who's details I received?!
BUT - the email CONFIRMED THEY HAVE PUT THE ACCOUNT ON HOLD. 30 days... in early February (my first email to ARC was on 21 Jan... this amount of chasing made it well into Feb until they managed to respond.)
Today I got the call that my request for clearance will be submitted. Obviously I asked to be able to review my paperwork as my financials became a mess from a clean credit history.... but when I ran an updated report on checkmyfile.com.... voila:
DEFAULTS. In November, December and January, on the same account by QQ. 3 Defaults.... while the account has been confirmed to be on hold.
My questions:
1) their practice of splitting only instalments that are late not the whole amount, thus increasing the actual instalments to be paid if you fail to pay a single instalment - is this even legal?
2) my offer to them received no response in august and they kept debiting my DC despite me advising them mid-july that they no longer have the authority to do so - this is not legal either, is it? (I doubt Lloyds would've taken my side if this was legal!)
3) can a company log 3 consecutive default notices for the past 3 months, without serving me, while in touch with me and AFTER I complain about questions 1 and 2? While their DCA claims the account is on hold?
4) What about their DCA simply sending me this dude's name, account number and debt amount?
5) if anyone has any experience with SC's, how can I get granted with this mess. I will disclose EVERYTHING it's not like I want to hide this on my SC form - that's why I asked to be able to review the form - but do I have the slightest chance? My degradation of credit score corresponds with my loss of employment, it's clear from my credit history... but without the SC I will remain unemployed.
PS - QQ and ARC have been informed in early January that I am willing to do my utmost to agree and negotiate as I need to be without Defaults for the SC... and I was without defaults at the time. They logged these 3 backwards... so now my old SC application that was prepared two months ago looks like I was deliberately hiding what was not there 2 months ago. The level of the SC is the lowest.
Thanks a lot to everyone who reads through this and responds. I appreciate!!!
Sorry it's going to be long. The background is that I am currently unemployed a few months now, so the financial damages start to mount, I start to reach the 3-months magical limit where defaults would be logged. So I try making payments to everyone from JSA (a true trick.) and I get behind on rent at the end of this week for the first time...
this comes in a situation where I could be working (having spent the past 2 months in a burocratic stall thanks to my home country taking their sweet time confirming I am not a criminal) - I have this role since December but could not start as it requires security clearance and finally the paperwork is compiled ready for submission to request it.
However my financials have changed, thanks to the aforementioned in the subject.
In december I had no Defaults, I had 1-month arrears max. Now I am in 2-month arrears on my CC's but maintained - they received payments this month so no Default gets logged there, and they are kept in the loop.... (thumbsup to Barclaycard offering a 30-day hold without any payment required, when I told them I'm waiting for the clearance.)
The aforementioned Quickquid I had an account with since early summer. I ended up in a situation where I couldn't maintain paying back in full (paydayloans - they get bigger and bigger by paid in full...) I asked them to let me pay in installments. They didn't discuss how much I could pay. They told me upfront it's £375/month. I couldn't afford and told them it's too high but they told me that is the only option.
I paid for the first month and failed the second. I got in touch, explaining I failed because I don't have £375 altogether - as I advised previously - and please look into lowering the amount. They said OK, they do instalments of the £375, 6x£60 will have to be paid. BUT - in their "helpful attitude" they refused to address the rest of the £375 instalments. I told them it's impossible this way, as it means the actual payment is £375+£60 next month... how could I pay this if I couldn't pay just £375? They didn't care.
They told me, to have lower instalments on the £375's monthly, I have to FAIL ON ALL £375 INSTALMENTS.
At that point I contacted Lloyds and withdrew the CPA - I did this by canceling the QuickQuid DD online. I advised QQ that I withdrew the CPA. I had no other choice! I can't pay £60 via DD and refuse the £375, it's all or nothing with the DD - and they didn't give me acc number to pay via bank transfer...
QQ debited my card the month after, Lloyds making the mistake of letting it through, but Lloyds reversed for me after I called them and referred to the relevant paragraphs in the relevant acts 2-3x plus told them exactly when were they advised that the CPA is withdrawn. They were so helpful they said they instal an automatic reversal, which they did, in case QQ tried to use my card details.
--- I say DD and CPA - because it was "Card not Present" but in the QQ agreement, and they use card details not acc details so it'd be according to CPA; but QQ logged it under DD on my account enabling me to remove the authority simply by removing the DD. I removed it online and Lloyds accepted that as notice when I talked to them (saying since it was there I considered that as notice... and ever since if I cancel or edit DD/SO, I do online it always works.)
QQ tried using my card, monthly meaning I was in standstill - either I enable them to use my card and they take whatever they wish or I do nothing - which was their own advice!
In the meantime I contacted them in august when it looked I may be able to pay in instalments of about £200 and offered them this. NO RESPONSE AT ALL to my emails.
They just kept charging my card monthly for amounts in the excess between £450-500 monthly.
I received no warnings, contacts or Default notice from them.
Then I was contacted by QQ (in early January) via email that they pass on the debt to ARC. (I can't recall a default notice - if they sent it was an email notice but I believe I got that from elsewhere not from these two.)
I responded to QQ to query why they never reacted to my offer and gave me these advices and also to get some info on their DCA as I had nothing from the DCA. NO RESPONSE except that they passed on the debt. It took a week to get contact details to ARC. I tried to get QQ to look into their "helpful attitude" and nonresponse to my offer, but what I got was they tried to help me! Literally stating this to describe their "cannot pay £375 so must pay £435 and more" - approach.
When I wrote to QQ becaue they sent me useless answers, that OK, they obviously tried to use my card details after CPA withdrawn, they gav me the advice of "get into late payment we only talk to you afterwards" and refused to lower the instalments, and I wihs to receive a final response, then ARC finally emailed me. The ARC email was an initial one "we took over..." and QQ provided a "final response" quickly maintaining they were helpful and did everything correctly. The QQ correspondence died out at this point. They stated I contacted my bank to get back the moneys charged - but it was automatic, as they had no authority and it has been proven to Lloyds so Lloyds didn't let them debit.
They never addressed why they didn't respond to my offer - not a word about it.
Still at this point, early-mid January, no Defaults on my records, QQ maintained payments.
I responded to ARC - 5 TIMES! I actually started tracking the emails by "this is my fourth attempt in response... " "This is my 5th attempt in response...." and so on. I got no response to my emails. I sent the first one nicely, explaining my situation and asking if they could 1) put the account on hold or 2) if not then advise me of a minimum instalment that could be acceptable for them.
After my 5th email and one that stated if they don't respond then the OFT or FOS or whoever governs them will learn about it, I received a long winded response... WITH SOMEONE ELSE'S ACCOUNT NUMBER, NAME AND DEBT AMOUNT!
I responded, stating this and that the email - as confusing as it is - seems to be unrelated to my issue as well.
They resent the SAME email with a red header "Ignore the previous email, this one has the correct details, we confirm we didn't disclose your acc details." - What do they tell the dude who's details I received?!
BUT - the email CONFIRMED THEY HAVE PUT THE ACCOUNT ON HOLD. 30 days... in early February (my first email to ARC was on 21 Jan... this amount of chasing made it well into Feb until they managed to respond.)
Today I got the call that my request for clearance will be submitted. Obviously I asked to be able to review my paperwork as my financials became a mess from a clean credit history.... but when I ran an updated report on checkmyfile.com.... voila:
DEFAULTS. In November, December and January, on the same account by QQ. 3 Defaults.... while the account has been confirmed to be on hold.
My questions:
1) their practice of splitting only instalments that are late not the whole amount, thus increasing the actual instalments to be paid if you fail to pay a single instalment - is this even legal?
2) my offer to them received no response in august and they kept debiting my DC despite me advising them mid-july that they no longer have the authority to do so - this is not legal either, is it? (I doubt Lloyds would've taken my side if this was legal!)
3) can a company log 3 consecutive default notices for the past 3 months, without serving me, while in touch with me and AFTER I complain about questions 1 and 2? While their DCA claims the account is on hold?
4) What about their DCA simply sending me this dude's name, account number and debt amount?
5) if anyone has any experience with SC's, how can I get granted with this mess. I will disclose EVERYTHING it's not like I want to hide this on my SC form - that's why I asked to be able to review the form - but do I have the slightest chance? My degradation of credit score corresponds with my loss of employment, it's clear from my credit history... but without the SC I will remain unemployed.
PS - QQ and ARC have been informed in early January that I am willing to do my utmost to agree and negotiate as I need to be without Defaults for the SC... and I was without defaults at the time. They logged these 3 backwards... so now my old SC application that was prepared two months ago looks like I was deliberately hiding what was not there 2 months ago. The level of the SC is the lowest.
Thanks a lot to everyone who reads through this and responds. I appreciate!!!
Comment