#38 (permalink) eveb
Basic Account Customer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7
Applicat to have stay lifted-refused
Hi All,
I attended a hearing this week at Gloucester County Court for Application (under rule 23) for lifting of Stay which had been placed on my claim.
1. The bank HBOS failed to arrive
2. THe judge refused to lift stay on the grounds that 'a case had been heard in Leeds ' recently in the supreme court, where it was ruled that stays were to remain in place. The judge asked me if I had heard of this case, and I said no.
3. He said that the precedent for refusal for stays to be lifted had therefore been set for county courts by this case.
4.I was taken aback as I had not heard of this casr, so was unprepared for his refusal.
5.The applicat had been made on several grounds including
a.)real financial hardship , backed up by documents,
b)the failure of the bank to provide bank statements under the Data Protection Act (claim instituted in Sept last year and HBOS still has not supplied statements!!!!) Had reported them to the IFO, who are currently still looking into it.
c.)The default notice they had placed was unlawful.
I pointed out the banks failure to supply the statements on the running of this account, despite many many requests for over 1 year , but he said that my original Partic of Claim did not provide for a demand that the bank supply the statements, therefore he could not give a ruling for the stay to be lifted on those grounds....
My original partic of claim had to be made on the ' claim of not more than £5000.00 as the bank statements have to date not been supplied by the bank' principle.
I told him that HBOS collections dept were harrassing me with continued calls for payment, despite my letters to them saying this account is under dispute, etc, and no more payments would be made etc.
He said all he could do was to issue an order that HBOS no longer are permitted to harrass me for the debt until the test case is heard...
I left the court almost in tears , feeling that the justice system had somehow failed the man in the street.
I was wondering whether I can LODGE AN OBJECTION TO HIS RULING or alternatively now MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENTS OF PARTICULARS OF CLAIM to include the demand for the bank to supply the staements?
After I left the court I felt so frustrated and defeated, but im now willing to keep going -SO ANY SUGGESTIONS WOULD BE VERY WELCOME.
apologies for the lengthiness of this post !
Take care and good luck to the rest of you.
Thanks.
Basic Account Customer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7
Applicat to have stay lifted-refused
Hi All,
I attended a hearing this week at Gloucester County Court for Application (under rule 23) for lifting of Stay which had been placed on my claim.
1. The bank HBOS failed to arrive
2. THe judge refused to lift stay on the grounds that 'a case had been heard in Leeds ' recently in the supreme court, where it was ruled that stays were to remain in place. The judge asked me if I had heard of this case, and I said no.
3. He said that the precedent for refusal for stays to be lifted had therefore been set for county courts by this case.
4.I was taken aback as I had not heard of this casr, so was unprepared for his refusal.
5.The applicat had been made on several grounds including
a.)real financial hardship , backed up by documents,
b)the failure of the bank to provide bank statements under the Data Protection Act (claim instituted in Sept last year and HBOS still has not supplied statements!!!!) Had reported them to the IFO, who are currently still looking into it.
c.)The default notice they had placed was unlawful.
I pointed out the banks failure to supply the statements on the running of this account, despite many many requests for over 1 year , but he said that my original Partic of Claim did not provide for a demand that the bank supply the statements, therefore he could not give a ruling for the stay to be lifted on those grounds....
My original partic of claim had to be made on the ' claim of not more than £5000.00 as the bank statements have to date not been supplied by the bank' principle.
I told him that HBOS collections dept were harrassing me with continued calls for payment, despite my letters to them saying this account is under dispute, etc, and no more payments would be made etc.
He said all he could do was to issue an order that HBOS no longer are permitted to harrass me for the debt until the test case is heard...
I left the court almost in tears , feeling that the justice system had somehow failed the man in the street.
I was wondering whether I can LODGE AN OBJECTION TO HIS RULING or alternatively now MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENTS OF PARTICULARS OF CLAIM to include the demand for the bank to supply the staements?
After I left the court I felt so frustrated and defeated, but im now willing to keep going -SO ANY SUGGESTIONS WOULD BE VERY WELCOME.
apologies for the lengthiness of this post !
Take care and good luck to the rest of you.
Thanks.
Comment