Hi
I have filed a defence stating claimant has not proved the debt is mine despite my requests for disclosure. Also that no proper letter before claim has been served. Claimant solicitors who issued the claim stayed the claim after i filed the defence but have now shown copies of my bank statements showing that i borrowed money from a payday company in 2012 which withdrew the money from my bank account - i had no money in my account or overdraft agreement.
Please advise whether a copy of a bank statement is sufficient proof that i owe the debt as i have asked claimants for full disclosure, signed credit agreements etc? Could i also claim costs from the claimant or his solicitors for corresponding with them, perusing papers, checking the law etc as they only produced the bank statement after they started the claim in court and after i filed the defence despite my written requests for disclosure in the last 3 years?
Please also advise of anything else that i may not be aware.
Many thanks
I have filed a defence stating claimant has not proved the debt is mine despite my requests for disclosure. Also that no proper letter before claim has been served. Claimant solicitors who issued the claim stayed the claim after i filed the defence but have now shown copies of my bank statements showing that i borrowed money from a payday company in 2012 which withdrew the money from my bank account - i had no money in my account or overdraft agreement.
Please advise whether a copy of a bank statement is sufficient proof that i owe the debt as i have asked claimants for full disclosure, signed credit agreements etc? Could i also claim costs from the claimant or his solicitors for corresponding with them, perusing papers, checking the law etc as they only produced the bank statement after they started the claim in court and after i filed the defence despite my written requests for disclosure in the last 3 years?
Please also advise of anything else that i may not be aware.
Many thanks
Comment