1 took out a TSB credit card in 1988, defaulting in 2004. Having made small monthly payments since,
but with various settlement offers rejected, a CCA request resulted in reconstituted docs. being sent,
with Lloyd's/TSB advising that these "complied with the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and
Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 and therefore comply with the obligations set out in section
77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974."
However, as the address shown was incorrect (being from 1997) I informed them of this and that, as
it was not a true copy, it was not-compliant and therefore unenforceable, but to try to finalize this, I also
made another F&F settlement offer (around 25% on £7K O/S). Unbeknown to me, the debt had been
sold to Cabot, who subsequently instructed Robinson Way, and I have therefore repeated my comments/
offer to them, yet they merely re-iterate what Lloyd's stated, insisting the debt is enforceable, threatening
further collections activity, although Robway have counter-offered with a 25% discount.
Would appreciate your advices, particularly as there seems a doubt whether the 1983 regulations do
apply here, and how strong my case would be if this came to court. Thanks in anticipation.
but with various settlement offers rejected, a CCA request resulted in reconstituted docs. being sent,
with Lloyd's/TSB advising that these "complied with the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and
Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 and therefore comply with the obligations set out in section
77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974."
However, as the address shown was incorrect (being from 1997) I informed them of this and that, as
it was not a true copy, it was not-compliant and therefore unenforceable, but to try to finalize this, I also
made another F&F settlement offer (around 25% on £7K O/S). Unbeknown to me, the debt had been
sold to Cabot, who subsequently instructed Robinson Way, and I have therefore repeated my comments/
offer to them, yet they merely re-iterate what Lloyd's stated, insisting the debt is enforceable, threatening
further collections activity, although Robway have counter-offered with a 25% discount.
Would appreciate your advices, particularly as there seems a doubt whether the 1983 regulations do
apply here, and how strong my case would be if this came to court. Thanks in anticipation.
Comment