Hi
My partner has received two letters from Cabot financial for two separate contracts with sky for early termination charges and usage. He has never had sky but he knows his ex partner had sky when he left her. The letters have come to my address we have only lived here a year. We contacted Cabot to say we know nothing about the contract and they told us we have to pay it as it is in my partners name. They would not tell us the property the contract was held at. When I contacted them for a cca under the consumer act 1974. They sent him a letter saying "please be advised your agreement with sky is a contract for communication services and is not based on credit, as the usage is paid on a monthly basis. Subsequently it is not regulated under the cca and your request is not applicable."Then advised him to contact the collections department to pay. Is this correct and can they still enforce the alleged debt when they have not provided details?
Many thanks guys. 😕
My partner has received two letters from Cabot financial for two separate contracts with sky for early termination charges and usage. He has never had sky but he knows his ex partner had sky when he left her. The letters have come to my address we have only lived here a year. We contacted Cabot to say we know nothing about the contract and they told us we have to pay it as it is in my partners name. They would not tell us the property the contract was held at. When I contacted them for a cca under the consumer act 1974. They sent him a letter saying "please be advised your agreement with sky is a contract for communication services and is not based on credit, as the usage is paid on a monthly basis. Subsequently it is not regulated under the cca and your request is not applicable."Then advised him to contact the collections department to pay. Is this correct and can they still enforce the alleged debt when they have not provided details?
Many thanks guys. 😕
Comment