Hi everyone new to the site
I have a long running dispute with a well known high street bank re the issuing of a default notice on my credit file (not sure if I can mention bank but found this site due to looking up a similar case on this site) I found myself in financial difficultly in 2008 so I entered agreement with all lenders to pay back the capital with no interest being charged.
I successfully paid all creditors back all bar one,of which I now I only owe two thousand pounds too I say only as I owed over £32000 at the start of all this.
In December 2011 I received a letter from a solicitors firm stating despite several reminders and a default issued served!!! that if payment was not received within 14 days court proceedings may be instigated against me at this point I owed them £3463.59. was not sure where this had come from as had been paying my monthly agreed amounts.
It also stated in the letter furthermore you are reminded that if our client does not receive a satisfactory response from me it is the policy of this bank to lodge information against me against various credit agencies.
It also went on to say that if I was unable to pay the full balance the bank may be prepared to accept a reduced sum together with realistic proposal for regular payments.
As per the letter I phoned the bank and set out my proposal and completed a expenditure form and I was then put on arrangement plan again.
In May of 2013 I asked the bank for a full and final settlement figure and they said if I paid £2000 pounds that would settle the account even though i owed them nearer £2300 which I agreed
I still owed another bank just over £2600 but it was one less monkey on my back! At no time in these conversations or letters/ accounts received did they state they had defaulted me in December 2011.
I took this to the financial ombudsman and they found said bank should not have defaulted me 2011 and should have defaulted me in May 2010 when my payment plan came to a end ,I am not sure how they found this to be true as my payment plans were reviewed every 6 months, but based this on that I was not meeting my contractual payments percentage to what was owed even though I was on a payment plan as this was poorly explained in the beginning or should I say not explained at all!
Can they back date default notice as was never given any option in 2010 and if I had not been making the full contractual payments since 2008 should it not be back dated to then.
I only found out or was made aware of this default when my wife and I tried to change out mortgage in June 2013 and was rejected on numerous occasions.
Sorry for the long winded post but thought more info the better can anyone help me
regards
Jon
I have a long running dispute with a well known high street bank re the issuing of a default notice on my credit file (not sure if I can mention bank but found this site due to looking up a similar case on this site) I found myself in financial difficultly in 2008 so I entered agreement with all lenders to pay back the capital with no interest being charged.
I successfully paid all creditors back all bar one,of which I now I only owe two thousand pounds too I say only as I owed over £32000 at the start of all this.
In December 2011 I received a letter from a solicitors firm stating despite several reminders and a default issued served!!! that if payment was not received within 14 days court proceedings may be instigated against me at this point I owed them £3463.59. was not sure where this had come from as had been paying my monthly agreed amounts.
It also stated in the letter furthermore you are reminded that if our client does not receive a satisfactory response from me it is the policy of this bank to lodge information against me against various credit agencies.
It also went on to say that if I was unable to pay the full balance the bank may be prepared to accept a reduced sum together with realistic proposal for regular payments.
As per the letter I phoned the bank and set out my proposal and completed a expenditure form and I was then put on arrangement plan again.
In May of 2013 I asked the bank for a full and final settlement figure and they said if I paid £2000 pounds that would settle the account even though i owed them nearer £2300 which I agreed
I still owed another bank just over £2600 but it was one less monkey on my back! At no time in these conversations or letters/ accounts received did they state they had defaulted me in December 2011.
I took this to the financial ombudsman and they found said bank should not have defaulted me 2011 and should have defaulted me in May 2010 when my payment plan came to a end ,I am not sure how they found this to be true as my payment plans were reviewed every 6 months, but based this on that I was not meeting my contractual payments percentage to what was owed even though I was on a payment plan as this was poorly explained in the beginning or should I say not explained at all!
Can they back date default notice as was never given any option in 2010 and if I had not been making the full contractual payments since 2008 should it not be back dated to then.
I only found out or was made aware of this default when my wife and I tried to change out mortgage in June 2013 and was rejected on numerous occasions.
Sorry for the long winded post but thought more info the better can anyone help me
regards
Jon
Comment