Good evening!
I've got a question about how can someone fight back the attachment of late payment fees.
The scenario is as follows; a supplier is hired to provide services (but there is no written contract) and the client does not pay the full amount on time. Then the supplier takes court action to recover the payment without giving notice and adds the late payment fees. However, the supplier hasn't completed part of the service that they were hired for and there is no evidence that indicates retention.
The other party finally pays the outstanding amount (for the work provided without paying the late payment fees, the interest as defined by The Bank of England and compensation) before the case goes to court but the supplier still hasn't completed their duty. What can be said to argue the charge of the late payment fees?
Is there any authority that would help in this situation?
I would appreciate your help and advice.
Thank you in advance.
I've got a question about how can someone fight back the attachment of late payment fees.
The scenario is as follows; a supplier is hired to provide services (but there is no written contract) and the client does not pay the full amount on time. Then the supplier takes court action to recover the payment without giving notice and adds the late payment fees. However, the supplier hasn't completed part of the service that they were hired for and there is no evidence that indicates retention.
The other party finally pays the outstanding amount (for the work provided without paying the late payment fees, the interest as defined by The Bank of England and compensation) before the case goes to court but the supplier still hasn't completed their duty. What can be said to argue the charge of the late payment fees?
Is there any authority that would help in this situation?
I would appreciate your help and advice.
Thank you in advance.
Comment