In response to this thread,http://legalbeagles.info/forums/show...ollector/page3, firstly thanks to [MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION] @warwick65 @nemesis45 @dianaM @MIKE770 [MENTION=5553]charitynjw[/MENTION] @pt2537 for all their help, advice and guidance.
One of the issues arising from this situation, where Arrow are instructing Restons to issue court proceedings for a debt sold to Arrow from another DCA, is that Arrow, when asked for the original credit agreement under the CCA 1974, stated that they were not the creditor 'as envisaged by the statute'.
I will edit this as people put me right but it seems as though they are the creditor and are trying to mislead people, possibly into thinking they can't ask Arrow for the credit agreement?
It's been suggested that I complain to the FCA and there was also a suggestion that this is common and that others may want to complain. I thought it might be an idea to start a new thread about this.
One of the issues arising from this situation, where Arrow are instructing Restons to issue court proceedings for a debt sold to Arrow from another DCA, is that Arrow, when asked for the original credit agreement under the CCA 1974, stated that they were not the creditor 'as envisaged by the statute'.
I will edit this as people put me right but it seems as though they are the creditor and are trying to mislead people, possibly into thinking they can't ask Arrow for the credit agreement?
It's been suggested that I complain to the FCA and there was also a suggestion that this is common and that others may want to complain. I thought it might be an idea to start a new thread about this.
Comment