Injunctions or cease and desist lowell again

[brockquietman]

It has crossed my mind that after reading lots of posts on here it is obvious it is lowell or whichever agent they choose that has to prove im owing a cent

If this is the case and its statute barred could i not just go to court and get a piece of paper that says its statute barred MORONS do not or ask any of your agents to contact me again ,

im quite miffed now im actually having to even bother sending emails sayin itss SB as the replies are just nauseus in their self belief they actually have a cat in hells chance ,im going to wait till new year till the site owner goes back to work and contact re taking these people to task


I sincerely hope more people who are being bothered will find this site

[wales01man]

Re: Injunctions or cease and desist lowell again

After receiving over 30 letters at 3 different addresses from Lowlifes and their friends none which have been answered I would think that unless an injunction was obtained ordering ALL named DCAs to stop calling/writing or texting an alleged debtor they would just pass the debt around all the DCAs not named.

Others will advise but I would think an injunction would be costly no court I expect would do this for free, why not just ignore the emails etc ?

[brockquietman]

Re: Injunctions or cease and desist lowell again

After receiving over 30 letters at 3 different addresses from Lowlifes and their friends none which have been answered I would think that unless an injunction was obtained ordering ALL named DCAs to stop calling/writing or texting an alleged debtor they would just pass the debt around all the DCAs not named.

Others will advise but I would think an injunction would be costly no court I expect would do this for free, why not just ignore the emails etc ?

I was just wondering ,im new to this sometimes what i read on one post i find conflicts what i have read on another elsewhere 8 years or thereabouts is a long time to get the message and im now at a point where i dont even have to give them time of day legally but they almost make it so you never forget their there being a PITA

was just hoping if i paid the money could i get a judge to say "its statute barred" its proved "its statute barred" and if you instruct or sell it to anyone else including your little desk next to each other companies to continue this charade then you will be liable afterall they have been told so why just sell it on ...its your egg tough theres nowt you can do

i have told them im not going to be giving them a penny

[bluebottle]

Re: Injunctions or cease and desist lowell again

The injunction you refer to is a Prohibitory Injunction under Section 3, Protection from Harassment Act 1997. The court fee for obtaining such on order is currently £175, but do check with the court as to current fee scales. Such injunctions prohibit the subject of the injunction from continuing to harass the Applicant, on pain of a fine, imprisonment or both, either directly or through third parties. This means they cannot play "Pass the Parcel" with an SB debt.

You would have to demonstrate to a judge that a debt was, indeed, SB in order to obtain an injunction to stop the Leeds Losers from continuing to harass you. I suspect that it would need to be stated on the PF39CH that the debt was SB and proof of this was attached to the PF39CH.

Seeking an injunction is not something that should be entered into lightly and I cannot stress enough that it is a measure of very last resort when all other methods of resolution have failed. You would also have to demonstrate to a judge there was a need to be granted an injunction, e.g. that the harassment was affecting your health, work, etc..