Hello,
Lowell contacted me in January 2012 (pretending to be 3) demanding over £200 within 20days. The debt appears to relate to a telephone number that belonged to my ex-wife's and which it appears she was paying up until she moved house in 2009. All bills would have been sent to her previous address which I have never lived at, although historically the mobile number in question started out in my name and was later transferred.
The threads on this forum have been a great deal of help. In January I replied to Lowells explaining that the account in question is not mine. I pointed out that I have my own mobile account with 3 and they have always known how to contact me, therefore if there genuinely had been a 3 debt attached to my name, they would have had no difficulty in contacting me.
In May they wrote to say they have information they want to discuss on the phone (I didn't fall for that one). I replied and demanded that they "adhere to the the etiquette of formal complaint handling and communicate any findings in writing". I also asked for evidence - "all the documentation you hold relating to the account in question".
This October I have received a third letter, that has twisted the information I have previously supplied to try to make me think they have evidence the debt is mine (which I note they have failed to supply).
What do I do next?
From reading the forums it sounds like a formal Subject Access Request asking for specific documents would be a good idea, but I don't understand the procedure.
Advice would be appreciated.
Lowell contacted me in January 2012 (pretending to be 3) demanding over £200 within 20days. The debt appears to relate to a telephone number that belonged to my ex-wife's and which it appears she was paying up until she moved house in 2009. All bills would have been sent to her previous address which I have never lived at, although historically the mobile number in question started out in my name and was later transferred.
The threads on this forum have been a great deal of help. In January I replied to Lowells explaining that the account in question is not mine. I pointed out that I have my own mobile account with 3 and they have always known how to contact me, therefore if there genuinely had been a 3 debt attached to my name, they would have had no difficulty in contacting me.
In May they wrote to say they have information they want to discuss on the phone (I didn't fall for that one). I replied and demanded that they "adhere to the the etiquette of formal complaint handling and communicate any findings in writing". I also asked for evidence - "all the documentation you hold relating to the account in question".
This October I have received a third letter, that has twisted the information I have previously supplied to try to make me think they have evidence the debt is mine (which I note they have failed to supply).
What do I do next?
From reading the forums it sounds like a formal Subject Access Request asking for specific documents would be a good idea, but I don't understand the procedure.
Advice would be appreciated.
Comment