Tweet
Dear Sir/ Madam,
It has come to our attention that one of our Church members has been the assumed subject of an attempt to collect an alleged debt. It appears we have an unconscionable contract or as is referred to in BC a frustrated contract.
You, in appearance, have attempted to assign or attach a name that, as of our members beliefs, cannot be accepted nor indeed allowed in defamation to her faith. The Legal fiction all capital name XXXXXX has been formed for a financial purpose and has been done without the consent of the Christian woman, XXXXXXXX. You are hereby informed of the religious formation of our member’s name, as shown above as of her religious beliefs. (2 Peter 2:3) It is our hope you will not offend our member’s beliefs with the intent on continuing using her name in an altered form for your convenience in a manner that amounts to a fraud and associates her flesh with a dead thing which is a violation of her faith.
We would like to come to an amicable agreement with you, so as to clear up this matter without recourse. I as Ministerial agent for XXXXXXXX, the Christian woman wish to inform you she has no lawfully recognizable contract with you. We in duty and official function are guiding her faith to leave the false, unlawful world of fictionally-created debt. We would like to aid you in your duty; so, if we can, we will start with what is commonly referred to as an assignment of debt. If you have such a valid lawful assignment, we would like to see a copy of it, so we can settle the true outstanding dejure balance of funds, if any.
We would also like to aid you in grasping our understanding of the loan or credit arrangement that has caused our miscommunication. It is clear we need to understand one-another in order to settle this account as is our offer here.
Now, when a loan or credit is advertised, it is as per the annum rate and as a loan. Then for it to be a true loan to transpire, the one offering the loan or credit must already be in possession of the loan or credit money. If the one offering the loan needs a negotiable instrument first, such as in a promissory note or a mortgage from the one wishing to borrow, then the paper instrument in reality and with no dispute from bankers, becomes funds once the borrower signs it. It is a negotiable instrument. The bank then trades this instrument worth face value as funds to gain the exact amount of currency from the Bank of Canada. When that instrument goes up to the bank of Canada an exchange takes place. It is important to note that a loan is not taking place at any time. The bank did not and has not the funds to lend or offer credit, for it in reality actually performs an exchange and then classifies it as a loan. The one expecting to get a loan actually was the one who funded it.
So, we can both agree this is exactly what happens in the case of credit or a loan, we must know that the banks have no money to loan you. The corporate Canada is in a debtor receivership position and has no lawful money. It is fiat currency. Our governor General is defacto. That means illegitimate. All defacto money is based in flesh, as we are a bankrupt country and have no gold. You may not have researched this, but to one of faith in God’s law, we are to not ignore knowledge.
The creditor makes the commercial rules. The World Bank is the Creditor. The World Bank says defacto is usurped power like under military rule! It is unlawful!
We also wish to know which legislation of man can abrogate God’s law. Exodus 20:3-5
God’s law is Supreme in this country, and our member is of the faith and belief that once a fraud is discovered, you are not to participate in it.(Statute of frauds 1677 Ezekiel 33:6)
We would then offer, our query as to the competency of your lawyers who you intend to go to, if we cannot resolve this issue in agreement ( R. v McKibbon 1988 Ezekiel 33:6 ) as that will be the challenge for you to overcome; should that be that case, as it is our contention as this is a Christian country with the King James Bible as the uncontested rule of law and uncontested standing as per her majesty’s vigilant defense and is infested with corrupt incompetent lawyers. It is a widely viewed sentiment of the Canadian people that would receive no argument.
In light of that information, it is important to know that we, in defense of one of our members, are officiating in performing as functions of our calling as ministers of God and his watchmen. (See 176 criminal code, Ezekiel 33:6) We as such are empowered and indeed of duty to enquire of the qualifications of the law firm you may intend to engage and as to their truly allegiant contracts of allegiance. This base foundation of integrity will be approached with all seriousness and diligence to affirm either the existence of lawful truly sanctioned council in her majesty’s name or imposters. We must in our faith be diligent.
It will be our desire and ministerial need to see the originals of those signed oaths as of our awareness of so much empirical evidence of widespread corruption. Then it will be our duty, to ensure no damages ensue upon our member upon such potential criminal association, that we ask those prospective lawyers, if they know the meaning of, in enforceable law, their oaths of allegiance. Dejure Motion for mandamus to her majesty’s westminster court and writ in nature of quo warranto will also be styled with standing cause of defense of the faith as of the corruption.
If they can and will in good faith tell me the meaning of their oaths in law , I will know they are men of honor and trust in understanding the laws of God and we can proceed. If not, it will be my duty to inquest for a dejure civil court of her majesty of that supposed agency and the publication of the corruption if so discovered.(Ron Carelli Vs Duplessis http://archives.cbc.ca/IDC-1-74-1461...uplessis/clip2 1959 Ezekiel 33:6) It is my hope and offer that no discriminatory thoughts or frustration will result of this revelation in good faith, but bear in mind, it is my total responsibility in my oath to God and in defense of my member’s faith that I only deal with those who honor and defend the word of God as per their legitimate understood oaths and I must find out, if those who took that oath know what it means. The alternative to not knowing what that oath means in law is either perjury or incompetence.
I rather doubt you would be entitled to subject our member to either type of unprofessional influence that would stain the administration of God’s justice and suffer our member with discrimination and intimidation to violate her faith and beliefs. We will also in your decision to proceed in litigation be seeking via inquest a dejure civil court which will recognize its sworn duty to her majesty as herself being sworn defender of the faith. The civil master’s court is civil law. It cannot obstruct my official performance and function of my calling in asking for the honor of its oaths meaning when my intent is to ensure no corruption is posturing as legitimate. My quest has standing!
The immediate reaction of some, to this notice of ecclesiastical awareness in law, is to label it as a get away attempt. We wish to assure you that the only thing that we of faith get away from is evil. We know, in fact, the law of usury was not for man’s interpretation to make it mean minimal interest. Usury is Biblically interpreted in the King James Bible as the charge of any interest for increase. But to charge interest on an exchange is fraud and unlawful once exposed. Leviticus 6:2 . To create an alteration in the name of a man or woman for a financial purpose without the permission of the owner of the name is fraud.
Now briefly back to the assignment of debt. Does our member have a contract with you?
Are you the holder of the bill in due course?
Did you become the holder of the bill by lawful assignment or fraud?
Was the name on that bill a legal fiction? Was written permission achieved to alter our members name for a financial purpose?
As far as our member is aware, she has no contract with you and has received no communication from her bank indicating you are their agent. Anyone can draw up a Final Notice.
So, in conclusion, it our hope you will chose to aid rather than obstruct our ministerial functions and will elect to not intimidate our members into associating with false-oath charlatans, as that will not fare good faith witness for your actions and subsequent involvement of others.
I hope we are in agreement that further communication is open and we await your good faith offer.
If you can provide us with the lawful assignment of a lawful debt , and a dejure court along with a dejure clerk and dejure lawyers in true honor and understanding of the true allegiance to God’s law, we wish and are compelled, to gladly submit the funds you request. To be clear, we are offering to pay immediately to a dejure agent of a dejure institution because of the outstanding awareness of corruption within the institutions of money and men. If you intend to ignore our good faith offer and continue intimidation, we will be seeking damages via private claim. You may also elect to waive the debt in lieu of your private awareness of the religious requirements and duty involved via section 55 and 151 of the Bills of Exchange act that applies to you and I make no use of.
Combined with our offer to pay to a lawful dejure agent of her majesty is also who can show us how the bank did not lie and commit fraud.
S126. A bill, of itself, does not operate as an assignment of funds in the hands of the drawee available for the payment thereof, and the drawee of a bill who does not accept as required by this Act is not liable on the instrument.
So, in good faith, we leave you with the Westminster Confession of faith from 1646 section 22. Lawful oaths; and for preaching and ministration sake section 24 how to stop gay marriages.
Blessings from Minister Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger ministerial envoy and guide for XXXXXXXXX
Served upon you in awareness of all rights in God’s law are reserved and offered without prejudice.
It has come to our attention that one of our Church members has been the assumed subject of an attempt to collect an alleged debt. It appears we have an unconscionable contract or as is referred to in BC a frustrated contract.
You, in appearance, have attempted to assign or attach a name that, as of our members beliefs, cannot be accepted nor indeed allowed in defamation to her faith. The Legal fiction all capital name XXXXXX has been formed for a financial purpose and has been done without the consent of the Christian woman, XXXXXXXX. You are hereby informed of the religious formation of our member’s name, as shown above as of her religious beliefs. (2 Peter 2:3) It is our hope you will not offend our member’s beliefs with the intent on continuing using her name in an altered form for your convenience in a manner that amounts to a fraud and associates her flesh with a dead thing which is a violation of her faith.
We would like to come to an amicable agreement with you, so as to clear up this matter without recourse. I as Ministerial agent for XXXXXXXX, the Christian woman wish to inform you she has no lawfully recognizable contract with you. We in duty and official function are guiding her faith to leave the false, unlawful world of fictionally-created debt. We would like to aid you in your duty; so, if we can, we will start with what is commonly referred to as an assignment of debt. If you have such a valid lawful assignment, we would like to see a copy of it, so we can settle the true outstanding dejure balance of funds, if any.
We would also like to aid you in grasping our understanding of the loan or credit arrangement that has caused our miscommunication. It is clear we need to understand one-another in order to settle this account as is our offer here.
Now, when a loan or credit is advertised, it is as per the annum rate and as a loan. Then for it to be a true loan to transpire, the one offering the loan or credit must already be in possession of the loan or credit money. If the one offering the loan needs a negotiable instrument first, such as in a promissory note or a mortgage from the one wishing to borrow, then the paper instrument in reality and with no dispute from bankers, becomes funds once the borrower signs it. It is a negotiable instrument. The bank then trades this instrument worth face value as funds to gain the exact amount of currency from the Bank of Canada. When that instrument goes up to the bank of Canada an exchange takes place. It is important to note that a loan is not taking place at any time. The bank did not and has not the funds to lend or offer credit, for it in reality actually performs an exchange and then classifies it as a loan. The one expecting to get a loan actually was the one who funded it.
So, we can both agree this is exactly what happens in the case of credit or a loan, we must know that the banks have no money to loan you. The corporate Canada is in a debtor receivership position and has no lawful money. It is fiat currency. Our governor General is defacto. That means illegitimate. All defacto money is based in flesh, as we are a bankrupt country and have no gold. You may not have researched this, but to one of faith in God’s law, we are to not ignore knowledge.
The creditor makes the commercial rules. The World Bank is the Creditor. The World Bank says defacto is usurped power like under military rule! It is unlawful!
We also wish to know which legislation of man can abrogate God’s law. Exodus 20:3-5
God’s law is Supreme in this country, and our member is of the faith and belief that once a fraud is discovered, you are not to participate in it.(Statute of frauds 1677 Ezekiel 33:6)
We would then offer, our query as to the competency of your lawyers who you intend to go to, if we cannot resolve this issue in agreement ( R. v McKibbon 1988 Ezekiel 33:6 ) as that will be the challenge for you to overcome; should that be that case, as it is our contention as this is a Christian country with the King James Bible as the uncontested rule of law and uncontested standing as per her majesty’s vigilant defense and is infested with corrupt incompetent lawyers. It is a widely viewed sentiment of the Canadian people that would receive no argument.
In light of that information, it is important to know that we, in defense of one of our members, are officiating in performing as functions of our calling as ministers of God and his watchmen. (See 176 criminal code, Ezekiel 33:6) We as such are empowered and indeed of duty to enquire of the qualifications of the law firm you may intend to engage and as to their truly allegiant contracts of allegiance. This base foundation of integrity will be approached with all seriousness and diligence to affirm either the existence of lawful truly sanctioned council in her majesty’s name or imposters. We must in our faith be diligent.
It will be our desire and ministerial need to see the originals of those signed oaths as of our awareness of so much empirical evidence of widespread corruption. Then it will be our duty, to ensure no damages ensue upon our member upon such potential criminal association, that we ask those prospective lawyers, if they know the meaning of, in enforceable law, their oaths of allegiance. Dejure Motion for mandamus to her majesty’s westminster court and writ in nature of quo warranto will also be styled with standing cause of defense of the faith as of the corruption.
If they can and will in good faith tell me the meaning of their oaths in law , I will know they are men of honor and trust in understanding the laws of God and we can proceed. If not, it will be my duty to inquest for a dejure civil court of her majesty of that supposed agency and the publication of the corruption if so discovered.(Ron Carelli Vs Duplessis http://archives.cbc.ca/IDC-1-74-1461...uplessis/clip2 1959 Ezekiel 33:6) It is my hope and offer that no discriminatory thoughts or frustration will result of this revelation in good faith, but bear in mind, it is my total responsibility in my oath to God and in defense of my member’s faith that I only deal with those who honor and defend the word of God as per their legitimate understood oaths and I must find out, if those who took that oath know what it means. The alternative to not knowing what that oath means in law is either perjury or incompetence.
I rather doubt you would be entitled to subject our member to either type of unprofessional influence that would stain the administration of God’s justice and suffer our member with discrimination and intimidation to violate her faith and beliefs. We will also in your decision to proceed in litigation be seeking via inquest a dejure civil court which will recognize its sworn duty to her majesty as herself being sworn defender of the faith. The civil master’s court is civil law. It cannot obstruct my official performance and function of my calling in asking for the honor of its oaths meaning when my intent is to ensure no corruption is posturing as legitimate. My quest has standing!
The immediate reaction of some, to this notice of ecclesiastical awareness in law, is to label it as a get away attempt. We wish to assure you that the only thing that we of faith get away from is evil. We know, in fact, the law of usury was not for man’s interpretation to make it mean minimal interest. Usury is Biblically interpreted in the King James Bible as the charge of any interest for increase. But to charge interest on an exchange is fraud and unlawful once exposed. Leviticus 6:2 . To create an alteration in the name of a man or woman for a financial purpose without the permission of the owner of the name is fraud.
Now briefly back to the assignment of debt. Does our member have a contract with you?
Are you the holder of the bill in due course?
Did you become the holder of the bill by lawful assignment or fraud?
Was the name on that bill a legal fiction? Was written permission achieved to alter our members name for a financial purpose?
As far as our member is aware, she has no contract with you and has received no communication from her bank indicating you are their agent. Anyone can draw up a Final Notice.
So, in conclusion, it our hope you will chose to aid rather than obstruct our ministerial functions and will elect to not intimidate our members into associating with false-oath charlatans, as that will not fare good faith witness for your actions and subsequent involvement of others.
I hope we are in agreement that further communication is open and we await your good faith offer.
If you can provide us with the lawful assignment of a lawful debt , and a dejure court along with a dejure clerk and dejure lawyers in true honor and understanding of the true allegiance to God’s law, we wish and are compelled, to gladly submit the funds you request. To be clear, we are offering to pay immediately to a dejure agent of a dejure institution because of the outstanding awareness of corruption within the institutions of money and men. If you intend to ignore our good faith offer and continue intimidation, we will be seeking damages via private claim. You may also elect to waive the debt in lieu of your private awareness of the religious requirements and duty involved via section 55 and 151 of the Bills of Exchange act that applies to you and I make no use of.
| Holder in Due Course | |
| Holder in due course | 55. (1) A holder in due course is a holder who has taken a bill, complete and regular on the face of it, under the following conditions, namely, (a) that he became the holder of it before it was overdue and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; and (b) that he took the bill in good faith and for value, and that at the time the bill was negotiated to him he had no notice of any defect in the title of the person who negotiated it. |
| Title defective | (2) In particular, the title of a person who negotiates a bill is defective within the meaning of this Act when he obtained the bill, or the acceptance thereof, by fraud, duress or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud. R.S., c. B-5, s. 56. |
S126. A bill, of itself, does not operate as an assignment of funds in the hands of the drawee available for the payment thereof, and the drawee of a bill who does not accept as required by this Act is not liable on the instrument.
| 152. (1) Where a bill has been protested for non-payment, any person may intervene and pay it under protest for the honor of any party liable thereon or for the honor of the person for whose account the bill is drawn. | |
| more than one offer | (2) Where two or more persons offer to pay a bill for the honor of different parties, the person whose payment will discharge most parties to the bill has the preference. |
| Refusal to receive payment | (3) Where the holder of a bill refuses to receive payment under protest, he loses his right of recourse against any party who would have been discharged by that payment. |
| Entitled to bill | (4) The payer for honor, on paying to the holder the amount of the bill and the notarial expenses incidental to its dishonor, is entitled to receive both the bill itself and the protest. |
| Liability for refusing | (5) Where the holder does not on demand in a case described in subsection (4) deliver up the bill and protest, he is liable to the payer for honor in damages. |
So, in good faith, we leave you with the Westminster Confession of faith from 1646 section 22. Lawful oaths; and for preaching and ministration sake section 24 how to stop gay marriages.
Blessings from Minister Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger ministerial envoy and guide for XXXXXXXXX
Served upon you in awareness of all rights in God’s law are reserved and offered without prejudice.
Comment