Hi Guys,
How are you all?
Can you help me make sense of something?
I have just received a letter with an invoice for £750.00 for work that I did for free (July 2008 to September 2008) and was accepted as such by an accredited training organisation.
The invoice states that payment is requested promptly.
The work was a mutual exchange of services conducted in a mutually beneficial verbal agreement.
I would provide my services for free for which all training costs would be borne by the organisation.
My part to play was that my two allotted candidates (which the Director could not directly handle them herself as she had six candidates in total), would receive support and guidance from me in gaining their NVQ level 2 qualifications.
I would be trained up for free as an accredited assessor (A1) and the Director could then maintain her ongoing obligations and look for further lucrative work, knowing that her candidates were in good hands with me. I’m also an accredited trainer and coach.
That is exactly what happened.
My candidates subsequently received their NVQ’s for all of the units that they studied with me.
This showed that they were competent in their understanding of their work and this was reflected with their gaining their NVQ level 2 awards.
This was also a reflection in my competency in asessing them.
During my training there were many inadequacies with the Director and her organisations’ training practices.
Just one of them was that I didn’t receive a vital piece of information: Witness Testimony from her, (originally to be received from her client: the sub-contractor) to be put in my file as proof of my candidates' gaining their NVQ’s, even though she had confirmation of their gaining competency in their NVQ studies back in September 2008.
This was one of the many reasons why I reported her to her awarding body, as she and her Assessor deliberately sent through my file to be assessed with gaping discrepancies.
I have my Complaint’s letter in my possession and can be sent to you if required?
Just as importantly, she is also involved with my claim against another company and is known as "Ms X".
See the thread here >> http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/showthread.php?t=19144
A statement she makes is the same one that the OCR made to me in their response letter, so it makes me wonder if they sent my complaint letter to her as part of their investigation.
Her actions are unbelievable and I think she may have financial difficulties.
I know that I do not owe this money.
In fact her company owes me money (to the tune of at least £1,000.00). I didn’t even charge her any expenses while travelling to her premises and to the candidates' training/workshop, to assess the two candidates assigned to me for my training.
I did not invoice her as it was a simple verbal mutually free service exchange agreement (for which she was paid via her sub-contractor and has financially benefited).
I have not seen her since late June 2009. Our only correspondence is via letter, so to receive this out of the blue from her is almost laughable.
I have a good mind to send her letter to the Quality & Compliance Dept at the OCR and show them that her latest actions are the result of my issuing a complaint against her and from their investigating her.
Can you please tell me where I stand with this and how I counter/rebutt her invoicing me?
Kind regards,
AdvS1.
How are you all?
Can you help me make sense of something?
I have just received a letter with an invoice for £750.00 for work that I did for free (July 2008 to September 2008) and was accepted as such by an accredited training organisation.
The invoice states that payment is requested promptly.
The work was a mutual exchange of services conducted in a mutually beneficial verbal agreement.
I would provide my services for free for which all training costs would be borne by the organisation.
My part to play was that my two allotted candidates (which the Director could not directly handle them herself as she had six candidates in total), would receive support and guidance from me in gaining their NVQ level 2 qualifications.
I would be trained up for free as an accredited assessor (A1) and the Director could then maintain her ongoing obligations and look for further lucrative work, knowing that her candidates were in good hands with me. I’m also an accredited trainer and coach.
That is exactly what happened.
My candidates subsequently received their NVQ’s for all of the units that they studied with me.
This showed that they were competent in their understanding of their work and this was reflected with their gaining their NVQ level 2 awards.
This was also a reflection in my competency in asessing them.
During my training there were many inadequacies with the Director and her organisations’ training practices.
Just one of them was that I didn’t receive a vital piece of information: Witness Testimony from her, (originally to be received from her client: the sub-contractor) to be put in my file as proof of my candidates' gaining their NVQ’s, even though she had confirmation of their gaining competency in their NVQ studies back in September 2008.
This was one of the many reasons why I reported her to her awarding body, as she and her Assessor deliberately sent through my file to be assessed with gaping discrepancies.
I have my Complaint’s letter in my possession and can be sent to you if required?
Just as importantly, she is also involved with my claim against another company and is known as "Ms X".
See the thread here >> http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/showthread.php?t=19144
A statement she makes is the same one that the OCR made to me in their response letter, so it makes me wonder if they sent my complaint letter to her as part of their investigation.
Her actions are unbelievable and I think she may have financial difficulties.
I know that I do not owe this money.
In fact her company owes me money (to the tune of at least £1,000.00). I didn’t even charge her any expenses while travelling to her premises and to the candidates' training/workshop, to assess the two candidates assigned to me for my training.
I did not invoice her as it was a simple verbal mutually free service exchange agreement (for which she was paid via her sub-contractor and has financially benefited).
I have not seen her since late June 2009. Our only correspondence is via letter, so to receive this out of the blue from her is almost laughable.
I have a good mind to send her letter to the Quality & Compliance Dept at the OCR and show them that her latest actions are the result of my issuing a complaint against her and from their investigating her.
Can you please tell me where I stand with this and how I counter/rebutt her invoicing me?
Kind regards,
AdvS1.
Comment