Hi all,
Just thought id share this one up here as I was a bit surprised and it could land people in a bad position.
Before christmas I got a barclaycard initial, they only gave me an £800 credit limit but thats fair enough. I used the card over christmas and went to 750 in use, so sent a £150 payment just after christmas, bringing my credit in use down to £600. I used the card into the new year which took it back up to £740 in use, and got my january statement telling me the minimum payment was due 30th jan for £20 odd quid. OK, so ive used it heavily over christmas, but im paying it off in large chunks.
I never pay minimums, so I sent over another £150 on 25th jan for the january bill. So heres where it gets a bit interesting and this seems almost designed to catch people out.
On Saturday 28th jan a letter dated friday 27th jan drops onto my doormat telling me barclays are, on the 31st on jan, reducing my credit limit to £700 due to information recived from 'credit reference agencies'. This means that the monthly (januray) minimum payment was not actuallythe £20 odd quid shown on my statement, but was now at least £50. Basicly, if I had budgeted to pay barclays the minimum payment they were asking for, I then had one working day (monday 30th) to come up with, and deposit, the extra money this new letter warned me about, or id be over my credit limit and into charges country.
Thankfully, I had already sent over way more than that (150) so theres no risk that I would have gone over my credit limit when it is reduced, however this does seem to smack of an underhand business practice - what if I did not have the extra money this month, or what if I had not already sent over a large amount? It usually takes time for a payment to be applied to a credit card account so it seems not only was the situation trying to get me over my limit, but also not give me enough time to send over money to stay within the new limit they have decided to set.
Does anyone know often do credit card companies reduce peoples credit limits to below the outstanding amount on the card? What sort of notice period are they supposed to give? Reducing a limit to less than the balance on the card, while leaving only one working day to have enough money sent over to cover the 'new' minimum payment just seems like its designed to ensure people go over their credit limit and start getting hit with penalties. This is especially troubling to me, considering this is a card designed for people who are just getting back on their feet as far as credit is concerned. This situation seems almost engineerd to ensure a percentage of customers will fall into a penalty charging cycle.
Ive also looked at my creidt report from all three agencies - not a single balck mark, not a single late payment, 3 years of solid good credit history and scores rating me in the 'good' to 'very good' categories (depending on the agency I used). No mortgage debt, no public records and only £3k in outstanding credit card debt - all paid on time and with at least double (usually quadruple, if not more) the monthly minimum payment made going back over several years.
If that is information that barclays would consider reducing my creidt limit over, id be very concenred at whatt hey do to people with late payments or worse.
Anyways, just thought id give a heads up about what happened so hopefully people dont get stuck if this happens to them.
Just thought id share this one up here as I was a bit surprised and it could land people in a bad position.
Before christmas I got a barclaycard initial, they only gave me an £800 credit limit but thats fair enough. I used the card over christmas and went to 750 in use, so sent a £150 payment just after christmas, bringing my credit in use down to £600. I used the card into the new year which took it back up to £740 in use, and got my january statement telling me the minimum payment was due 30th jan for £20 odd quid. OK, so ive used it heavily over christmas, but im paying it off in large chunks.
I never pay minimums, so I sent over another £150 on 25th jan for the january bill. So heres where it gets a bit interesting and this seems almost designed to catch people out.
On Saturday 28th jan a letter dated friday 27th jan drops onto my doormat telling me barclays are, on the 31st on jan, reducing my credit limit to £700 due to information recived from 'credit reference agencies'. This means that the monthly (januray) minimum payment was not actuallythe £20 odd quid shown on my statement, but was now at least £50. Basicly, if I had budgeted to pay barclays the minimum payment they were asking for, I then had one working day (monday 30th) to come up with, and deposit, the extra money this new letter warned me about, or id be over my credit limit and into charges country.
Thankfully, I had already sent over way more than that (150) so theres no risk that I would have gone over my credit limit when it is reduced, however this does seem to smack of an underhand business practice - what if I did not have the extra money this month, or what if I had not already sent over a large amount? It usually takes time for a payment to be applied to a credit card account so it seems not only was the situation trying to get me over my limit, but also not give me enough time to send over money to stay within the new limit they have decided to set.
Does anyone know often do credit card companies reduce peoples credit limits to below the outstanding amount on the card? What sort of notice period are they supposed to give? Reducing a limit to less than the balance on the card, while leaving only one working day to have enough money sent over to cover the 'new' minimum payment just seems like its designed to ensure people go over their credit limit and start getting hit with penalties. This is especially troubling to me, considering this is a card designed for people who are just getting back on their feet as far as credit is concerned. This situation seems almost engineerd to ensure a percentage of customers will fall into a penalty charging cycle.
Ive also looked at my creidt report from all three agencies - not a single balck mark, not a single late payment, 3 years of solid good credit history and scores rating me in the 'good' to 'very good' categories (depending on the agency I used). No mortgage debt, no public records and only £3k in outstanding credit card debt - all paid on time and with at least double (usually quadruple, if not more) the monthly minimum payment made going back over several years.
If that is information that barclays would consider reducing my creidt limit over, id be very concenred at whatt hey do to people with late payments or worse.
Anyways, just thought id give a heads up about what happened so hopefully people dont get stuck if this happens to them.
Comment