Hi,
Just hoping for some clarification on a CCA response i had regarding a HBOS credit card Lowells are dealing with,
Account opened Feb 2006 , default August 2012. Stated balance approx £1400.
I know they need to send me a true copy of the original and after months of saying it doesn't exist due to its age , a one page copy has appeared.Looks real enough , but a really poor copy.They sent a recent recon page of that copy of details plus extra sections i assume to make up for the poor copy.The poor copy has APR, about payments in basic form .Its addressed correctly but only signed and dated by me nothing from them .(Which as far as i know means its unenforceable unless by a court , and they probably win on that argument alone.)
However the margins are not copied/poor quality so the charges for example and fees for transfers, cheques etc are chopped off.The 'original copy' only shows the number 5 in the margin for each charge (£25 i'm sure it was then).
They seem to have tried to re-con the original they have sent except its clearly for a modern card not what i had .It has under parties my address as being what it was 6 years after it was opened (showing a clear re-con even though i'd moved twice since then so not sure why they chose that address.) The general apr's on them are totally different and the charges on the recon part are all £12 each when i have that 5 (of £25) remaining on the poor original.
If so i'm seeing it as failed with the original which they need as pre 2007 ( incomplete prescribed terms) and the other one(s) clearly modern totally inaccurate recons with the actual original signed/dated form proving that.They state in their letter its the original and don't mention even trying a recon which i thought they had to do to not mislead.
I'm certain about £500 of the approx £1400 'balance' is made up of penalty fees/interest.So SAR in the offing too.
Does all of that look correct? I'm fairly new to this and have hopefully learnt correct things up til now.Nearly accepted the agreement but looking at it again those recons seem in panic that the original copy is poor and missing those fees.Seems ironic that one form they sent totally disproves the other they sent .
Appreciate someone confirming my novice view of it is right/wrong.
Just hoping for some clarification on a CCA response i had regarding a HBOS credit card Lowells are dealing with,
Account opened Feb 2006 , default August 2012. Stated balance approx £1400.
I know they need to send me a true copy of the original and after months of saying it doesn't exist due to its age , a one page copy has appeared.Looks real enough , but a really poor copy.They sent a recent recon page of that copy of details plus extra sections i assume to make up for the poor copy.The poor copy has APR, about payments in basic form .Its addressed correctly but only signed and dated by me nothing from them .(Which as far as i know means its unenforceable unless by a court , and they probably win on that argument alone.)
However the margins are not copied/poor quality so the charges for example and fees for transfers, cheques etc are chopped off.The 'original copy' only shows the number 5 in the margin for each charge (£25 i'm sure it was then).
They seem to have tried to re-con the original they have sent except its clearly for a modern card not what i had .It has under parties my address as being what it was 6 years after it was opened (showing a clear re-con even though i'd moved twice since then so not sure why they chose that address.) The general apr's on them are totally different and the charges on the recon part are all £12 each when i have that 5 (of £25) remaining on the poor original.
If so i'm seeing it as failed with the original which they need as pre 2007 ( incomplete prescribed terms) and the other one(s) clearly modern totally inaccurate recons with the actual original signed/dated form proving that.They state in their letter its the original and don't mention even trying a recon which i thought they had to do to not mislead.
I'm certain about £500 of the approx £1400 'balance' is made up of penalty fees/interest.So SAR in the offing too.
Does all of that look correct? I'm fairly new to this and have hopefully learnt correct things up til now.Nearly accepted the agreement but looking at it again those recons seem in panic that the original copy is poor and missing those fees.Seems ironic that one form they sent totally disproves the other they sent .
Appreciate someone confirming my novice view of it is right/wrong.
Comment