Hi I'm not sure if this the right section. But.
I have asked MBNA to remove their account off of my CRF. They have refused to do so.
History.
1) in nov 2010 i was defaulted by mbna, for £150, bal was £4900
2) no further statements were produced since this date. Last one was oct 29th 2010 i believe
3) By the 23rd of dec of that year i had a court summons for the full amount plus costs of £5100
4) It finally came to court in feb 2012 in which sides agreed to remove the action and counter action. Which the court agreed to and have a judgement to that effect.
5) i did ask for the credit reference file to be amended, this was refused by mbna and never was part of the judgement.
6) no monies from me was given to mbna as part of the judgement
7) as of nov 2010 there is no public facing way of accessing the account online.
8) mbna are marking this as an active account
9). I believe GRACE v BLACK HORSE LIMITED [2014] EWCA Civ 1413 30/10/2014 forms a basis for it to be removed even though i believe it may fail under it being an irredeemably unenforceable agreement for which the judge(s) in that case have not perscribed a judgement to.
Reasoning
My understanding, as the account is in default since 11/10 it should fall off of my CRF in 11/16 but because mbna are marking it as active. will this still happen?
Because of 4) i understand effectively mbna can not take me to court again to recover any monies from me. Thus it is becomes unenforceable. Only way would be to get a set aside of the judgement in 2012?!
Can i then assume that if the account is unenforceable, then the account removed from the person's CRF? I can argue that in the above situation?
If i'm correct, what should do next?
I have asked MBNA to remove their account off of my CRF. They have refused to do so.
History.
1) in nov 2010 i was defaulted by mbna, for £150, bal was £4900
2) no further statements were produced since this date. Last one was oct 29th 2010 i believe
3) By the 23rd of dec of that year i had a court summons for the full amount plus costs of £5100
4) It finally came to court in feb 2012 in which sides agreed to remove the action and counter action. Which the court agreed to and have a judgement to that effect.
5) i did ask for the credit reference file to be amended, this was refused by mbna and never was part of the judgement.
6) no monies from me was given to mbna as part of the judgement
7) as of nov 2010 there is no public facing way of accessing the account online.
8) mbna are marking this as an active account
9). I believe GRACE v BLACK HORSE LIMITED [2014] EWCA Civ 1413 30/10/2014 forms a basis for it to be removed even though i believe it may fail under it being an irredeemably unenforceable agreement for which the judge(s) in that case have not perscribed a judgement to.
Reasoning
My understanding, as the account is in default since 11/10 it should fall off of my CRF in 11/16 but because mbna are marking it as active. will this still happen?
Because of 4) i understand effectively mbna can not take me to court again to recover any monies from me. Thus it is becomes unenforceable. Only way would be to get a set aside of the judgement in 2012?!
Can i then assume that if the account is unenforceable, then the account removed from the person's CRF? I can argue that in the above situation?
If i'm correct, what should do next?
Comment