• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Capital One Satisfied Default

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Capital One Satisfied Default

    Hi there,

    I've been reading this forum and others over and over for the best couple of weeks and was wondering if someone could offer some advice on my situation.

    I have on my credit file details of a credit card agreement with Cap1 which I defaulted on in February 2011. When I have checked through all of my documentation relating to the account I have found the default notice to be defective for the following reasons:

    1. There is no specific date for the breach to be remedied by.
    2. There is no specific information regarding the amount required to remedy the breach.

    The account was paid off in August 2012 and whilst I was making payments to clear the balance I claimed for the unlawful charges which had been applied to the account. The charges amounted to approximately £96 and the total balance at the date of default was £296.

    After reading ICO guidelines it seems I do not have a case to remove the default on the grounds of the charges applied, as the balance was not made up of charges alone. I also understand that just because the default balance has been paid does not mean that it will be removed and that it will be there for 6 years from the date of default.

    I have done a lot of reading on cases similar to mine and have read about unlawful recision on the back of a dodgy default notice.

    Would the fact that the default notice does not comply with the relevant legislation give me grounds for removal of the default from my credit file? If so, what would be the best way to tackle this?

    I have found various cases that would possibly help me, for example the following;

    The consumer credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983, and that a failure of a Default Notice or Termination Notice to be accurate not only invalidates such notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd V Swain & Co NLD 14 July 1998 but it is an unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the court enforcing any alleged debt (Wilson V First County Trust Ltd [2003] UKHL 40, Wilson V Robertsons (London) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1088, Wilson V Pawnbrokers [2005] EWCA Civ 147) - but would also give the claimant a claim for damages in the sum of £1000 (Kpophraror V Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119).

    Where do I start with this? Does anybody have an example of a letter I could send to Cap1 to get the ball rolling or have any information they could share from their experiences which could help me?

    thank you all in anticipation!

  • #2
    Re: Capital One Satisfied Default

    Hi and welcome

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you are referring to TWO separate issues above: one is the default notice, which is a CCA issue which would have been relevant if they'd taken you to court, but as you've paid off the debt, this will not happen. The other is the default reported to the CRAs, which is a DPA issue. The record is meant to reflect your conduct with the account, if you broke your agreement by failing to make contractual payments, the creditor has the right to record a default, even if the debt is later paid off in full, defaults are not usually removed, they are merely marked as 'settled' or 'satisfied', which is meant to show that you paid it off, not that you never defaulted on the account.

    A default would only be removed if it was recorded in error. A defective DN would only matter for the purpose of enforcement in court (obtaining a CCJ). The McGuffick v RBS case established that reporting to the CRAs does not amount to enforcement.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Capital One Satisfied Default

      Nooooo! That is bad news indeed, all for the sake of 300 lousy quid! It seems crazy that the two things are linked to one another and yet are covered by two completely separate pieces of legislation!

      I had had read about the McGuffick v RBS case, I just thought I was onto something when I read about the cases I mentioned before and a counterclaim for damages as in Kpophraror v Barclays.

      Is this definitely not something I could start a claim against Cap1 for or does the McGuffick case put the kibosh on this too?

      Thanks for your help FlamingParrot

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
      Working...
      X