Re: OFT writes to banks and building societies following recent CCA failures
I think the ECJ Ruling in Decmeber 2012 could be used in this instance on "The Right to the Truth and Disclosure"
Article 13, which includes a right of access to relevant information about alleged violations, both for the persons concerned and for the general public.
The right to the truth is not a novel concept in our case-law, and nor is it a new right. Indeed, it is broadly implicit in other provisions of the Convention, in particular the procedural aspect of Articles 2 and 3, which guarantee the right to an investigation involving the applicant and subject to public scrutiny.
In practice, the search for the truth is the objective purpose of the obligation to carry out an investigation and the raison d’être of the related quality requirements (transparency, diligence, independence, access, disclosure of results and scrutiny). For society in general, the desire to ascertain the truth plays a part in strengthening confidence in public institutions and hence the rule of law. For those concerned – the victims’ families and close friends – establishing the true facts and securing an acknowledgment of serious breaches of human rights and humanitarian law constitute forms of redress that are just as important as compensation, and sometimes even more so. Ultimately, the wall of silence and the cloak of secrecy prevent these people from making any sense of what they have experienced and are the greatest obstacles to their recovery.
Although this was an FOI ruling ...I think it could be argued and used in Data Protection Issues when banks, lenders and firm say that you are not entitled to certain information and use the data protection act to with hold certain information.
Just old Sparkie rambling again
Sparkie
Originally posted by Amethyst
View Post
Article 13, which includes a right of access to relevant information about alleged violations, both for the persons concerned and for the general public.
The right to the truth is not a novel concept in our case-law, and nor is it a new right. Indeed, it is broadly implicit in other provisions of the Convention, in particular the procedural aspect of Articles 2 and 3, which guarantee the right to an investigation involving the applicant and subject to public scrutiny.
In practice, the search for the truth is the objective purpose of the obligation to carry out an investigation and the raison d’être of the related quality requirements (transparency, diligence, independence, access, disclosure of results and scrutiny). For society in general, the desire to ascertain the truth plays a part in strengthening confidence in public institutions and hence the rule of law. For those concerned – the victims’ families and close friends – establishing the true facts and securing an acknowledgment of serious breaches of human rights and humanitarian law constitute forms of redress that are just as important as compensation, and sometimes even more so. Ultimately, the wall of silence and the cloak of secrecy prevent these people from making any sense of what they have experienced and are the greatest obstacles to their recovery.
Although this was an FOI ruling ...I think it could be argued and used in Data Protection Issues when banks, lenders and firm say that you are not entitled to certain information and use the data protection act to with hold certain information.
Just old Sparkie rambling again
Sparkie
Comment