Re: Tempty V Natwest
Dear District Judge Meredith
Tempty -v- Natwest Bank Plc
Claim No:********
I, the Claimant, refer to the claim as detailed above and specifically the order made by District Judge Meredith dated 03/09/2007.
“ Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copies of all documents (including any expert witness’s report) which he intends to rely on at the hearing no later than 25th September 2007’’
I wish to inform the court that the defendant has not complied with the order in that it has not served upon me the evidence, or any such documents, on which it intends to rely at the forthcoming hearing.
No application to set aside this order has been made by the Defendant.
I can confirm that my documents were filed on 14/08/2007 and served to the Defendant on 14/08/2007. This was in compliance of the order made by Judge ********* on **/**/2007.
It is submitted that the Defendants failure to comply with the order dated 03/09/2007 creates a significant imbalance between the parties in light of the forthcoming hearing, which I believe to be contrary to the overriding objective. This imbalance is particularly exacerbated by the fact that the Defendant is represented by specialist solicitors, whereas I am a litigant in person.
Accordingly, it is respectfully suggested that the court may be minded to make an order pursuant to Rule 3.4(2)(c) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Yours faithfully
Dear District Judge Meredith
Tempty -v- Natwest Bank Plc
Claim No:********
I, the Claimant, refer to the claim as detailed above and specifically the order made by District Judge Meredith dated 03/09/2007.
“ Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copies of all documents (including any expert witness’s report) which he intends to rely on at the hearing no later than 25th September 2007’’
I wish to inform the court that the defendant has not complied with the order in that it has not served upon me the evidence, or any such documents, on which it intends to rely at the forthcoming hearing.
No application to set aside this order has been made by the Defendant.
I can confirm that my documents were filed on 14/08/2007 and served to the Defendant on 14/08/2007. This was in compliance of the order made by Judge ********* on **/**/2007.
It is submitted that the Defendants failure to comply with the order dated 03/09/2007 creates a significant imbalance between the parties in light of the forthcoming hearing, which I believe to be contrary to the overriding objective. This imbalance is particularly exacerbated by the fact that the Defendant is represented by specialist solicitors, whereas I am a litigant in person.
Accordingly, it is respectfully suggested that the court may be minded to make an order pursuant to Rule 3.4(2)(c) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Yours faithfully
Comment