Ok, something that popped into my head today....
A couple of years ago when so many people were getting their charges back, a lot accepted a 'goodwil gesture' from their banks as they wouldn't admit liability or agree that their charges were incorrect...
If the banks lose next month, which a lot think they will, does that then mean that the bank will either
a.) Pay charges directly back into accounts or
b.) We will have to send a claim in as we have done in the past..
Now my question is, as the refunds that many people have had in the past were 'goodwill gestures', does that then leave the banks open to people claiming back charges that were previously credited as such.
Does that make sense.. or am i off on a tangent again.
A couple of years ago when so many people were getting their charges back, a lot accepted a 'goodwil gesture' from their banks as they wouldn't admit liability or agree that their charges were incorrect...
If the banks lose next month, which a lot think they will, does that then mean that the bank will either
a.) Pay charges directly back into accounts or
b.) We will have to send a claim in as we have done in the past..
Now my question is, as the refunds that many people have had in the past were 'goodwill gestures', does that then leave the banks open to people claiming back charges that were previously credited as such.
Does that make sense.. or am i off on a tangent again.
Comment