Evening, over the years I have read many complaints about the FOS and the way they go about things. My long held opinion is that the FOS aren't there to regulate or help Joe Public. Years ago there was a major accident involving gas and some forward thinking gas engineers decided to form a regulator themselves because they could see regulation being brought into the industry.There idea was that they could form a regulator with the interest of the gas industry at its heart and the government would then use them instead of setting up their own body, far easier to use something already there than start something new. This was the basis of CORGI and the aim was to be biased towards the industry instead of having rules imposed on the industry by people in the government who didn't know the industry.What does this have to do with the FOS I hear you say, well I am under the impression that the FOS was set up and funded by the financial industry for much the same reason. They seem to spend a lot of time coming up with a solution to issues that gives joe public the impression the perpetrators have been punished but also have let the perpetrators get off quite mildly. This comes about because they are an industry led and financed organisation set up to make peace and mediate.Its easy to do with joe average really because joe average has seen the banks get fined for wrong doing but they have never asked where the funds from the fines go to (never the people wronged), they haven't worked out that the fines just go on the banks loss sheets so they will come up with another way to get the losses back (hence a limited number of free bank accounts). Joe average is happy with the impression that there was a punishment there even though nobody has actually been punished except themselves when they pay back the fines through increased bank charges. Does anyone have the evidence that the FOS are a government run regulatory body with fairness at their core or do we just assume it?
Barclays First Plus FOS Mediation
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Originally posted by Daisy 409 View PostI believe that The FOS has stated that 150 of these cases have been informally settled , and that there is 60 still waiting to be settled. I can't find any of the 150 on the FOS decisions page, does anyone know why this would be?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Russetk View Post
Challenging First plus over the rates and suitability?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/fpcomplaints
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fred View Post
No, there is a lot of different circumstances that would determine your complaint, that is, assuming you are a customer of FP or Elderbridge that feels you may have paid too much. Its not as simple as a copy paste. Can you answer the questions in the Facebook link below ?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/fpcomplaints
Comment
-
Hi just been reading some of peoples post about these first plus now elderbridge loans I have one for some unknown reason I called them up today for a early settlement figure and found out my interest was frozen since 2015 and am just paying my capital off so my full £320 a month is going to my capital and there is £9000 interest still to pay to date
then once capital is payed off in 2.5 years I’ve then got to start paying off interest over the term left on the loan 7.5 years has anyone experienced this
Comment
-
It's good to find this!
I took out a First Plus (now Elderbridge) loan in 2005. I was told that interest rates tracked base rate so first complained when I noticed they were not decreasing (c.2008 probably). I was told that interest rates followed FHBR and not base rate so complained again when these rates were reduced and there was still no change to interest rates. This time I was told that, due to a fall in house prices, First Plus were exposed so would not reduce interest rates.
I looked online (probably around 2012 / 2013) and found a huge number of complaints of a similar nature - none of which could be progressed as the regulator was uninterested.
It looks as though the situation has changed so I'll have a look through the threads and will pick this up where I can. I'm happy to pay the capital and the appropriate level of interest but, like many many others, I feel cheated, overcharged and lied to.
I hope there's a way to hold Barclays / First Plus to account as they were clearly miss selling this product.
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Comment