I had a Bailiff advice of warrant to seize goods today for a Council Tax Debt relating to 2012 -13 although I do not have absolute dates over than above given to me verbally by the Bailif. I was in arrears and over past three months believed I had completely cleared my debt. In September , I spoke to the Council customer service date to tell them I was still being chased by Rossendales but so far as I was aware I had cleared my final outstanding debts. They agreed with 'nothing outstanding ' - & I stupidly left it at that.
I know the date and approx time of this conversation - can I demand a transcript, as you can bet they are going to deny this when I speak to them, their lines are all down at the moment.
In addition , two weeks prior to above conversation I telephoned the Council and offered to pay all my debts in full , that day , via debit card as I knew the final debt was 'in transit' ie still not showing on Rossendales account for me. They point blank refused & said I had to deal with Rossendales which of course incurred more charges
I can't believe they ( bailiffs) are now saying an even earlier debt ( same address) is liable than the debts I cleared in September. Why was it not attached and dealt with in September?
I know the date and approx time of this conversation - can I demand a transcript, as you can bet they are going to deny this when I speak to them, their lines are all down at the moment.
In addition , two weeks prior to above conversation I telephoned the Council and offered to pay all my debts in full , that day , via debit card as I knew the final debt was 'in transit' ie still not showing on Rossendales account for me. They point blank refused & said I had to deal with Rossendales which of course incurred more charges
I can't believe they ( bailiffs) are now saying an even earlier debt ( same address) is liable than the debts I cleared in September. Why was it not attached and dealt with in September?
Comment