Re: Naive bailiff encounter
By the way - you guys have already elevated into legendary status in my eyes for replying well into the hours of Saturday morning. Now, In response to your posts:
Yes - as soon as they mentioned taking things, I explained that most of the items in there were mine & that there was no chance my mums items could cover the costs (he claimed they would need £10k worth of items to cover the debt). There are more items upstairs that they didnt look at, most of which I can prove doesnt belong to my mum...again the things I cant prove would only add another £100 - £200 at the most.
Certainly I have no reason to protect them! Firm is called JBW
Thank you for the document - had a quick look but my ability to decipher even mild legal jargon might be impaired at this hour!
She is heading over to the council on Monday morning about this.
Again that is good to hear. I will have to look up Rai & Rai -v- Birmingham City Council in the morning (if possible). How long does a Regulation 46 complaint take to go though? In the meantime can they still come and try to seize goods forcibly? Do they need to give notice before they do this?
By the way - you guys have already elevated into legendary status in my eyes for replying well into the hours of Saturday morning. Now, In response to your posts:
Originally posted by CleverClogs
View Post
Excessive, as one would expect. Can you say which firm of thugs was involved?
That's quite different from the £3000 he mentioned but, then, bailiffs tell lies.
For that size of debt, the correct levy fee would be (24.50 + 16 + 87.3*0.025), rounded up to £43.
He's charged two visit fees for a single visit, which seems a bit naughty.
That is certainly naughty, as it is an "up front fee" - they may not charge for "removal" or a "van fee" without giving their victim a chance to pay.
What is that supposed to mean?
Also naughty - they are not permitted to charge any fees not listed in the regulations.
Please see the attached file/
For that size of debt, the correct levy fee would be (24.50 + 16 + 87.3*0.025), rounded up to £43.
He's charged two visit fees for a single visit, which seems a bit naughty.
That is certainly naughty, as it is an "up front fee" - they may not charge for "removal" or a "van fee" without giving their victim a chance to pay.
What is that supposed to mean?
Also naughty - they are not permitted to charge any fees not listed in the regulations.
Please see the attached file/
Thank you for the document - had a quick look but my ability to decipher even mild legal jargon might be impaired at this hour!
If your mother was already paying this debt off, what was the bailiff doing at her home, behaving like a football hooligan? That could amount to harassment on the part of the council, the bailiff or both. Someone at the local council has some explaining to do. Get onto your local ward councillor and the elected Leader of the Council.
She is heading over to the council on Monday morning about this.
Please be aware that the behaviour you have experienced can be curbed with something called a Regulation 46 complaint to the magistrates court that issued the LO. The court can order the council to desist from that sort of action. It was a Regulation 46 complaint that resulted in the ruling in Rai & Rai -v- Birmingham City Council [1993].
Comment