Re: Help please - Are Bristow and Sutor over charging?
Before they can charge for a attendance to remove they must have levied on goods in order to 'remove' them.
There were no goods levied and therefore available to be 'removed' on the 3/9/2012, as a levy had not been applied on the car in question at that point.......so that must be challenged. They attended on the 9/11/2012 and levied upon a vehicle owned by a third party... so that needs to be challenged, they arrived in a transit van to remove a vehicle (that I would like to have seen!!!)..on the whole they can be seen to be very inventive with their charges and you need to get this back into Court to show that????
pepsie
Before they can charge for a attendance to remove they must have levied on goods in order to 'remove' them.
There were no goods levied and therefore available to be 'removed' on the 3/9/2012, as a levy had not been applied on the car in question at that point.......so that must be challenged. They attended on the 9/11/2012 and levied upon a vehicle owned by a third party... so that needs to be challenged, they arrived in a transit van to remove a vehicle (that I would like to have seen!!!)..on the whole they can be seen to be very inventive with their charges and you need to get this back into Court to show that????
pepsie
Comment