I recently had a bailiff visit. He got into my house whilst i was out as patio had been left unlocked. He listed an inventory of goods siezed.
This council tax was regards a previous property, I never owed the money but had to prove this to the council to be honest i should have dealt with it a lot quicker than i did! ..... I managed to do this that day and get the debt written off all but £60 court costs which i have now paid. The bailiff also posted a notice of seizure of goods listing his 'charges' as follows £488.81 CTax 42.50 attendance to levy fees 41.00 + 37.00 Levy fee 24.50 Redemption of goods fees 180 Van.
Now i manged to provide receipts that none of the goods listed on the inventory belonged to me i also provided the bailiff with a copy of the tenancy agreement for the current property which is in my patners name. I therefore thought the levy/liability would now become invalid?
Now as far as i am concerned the bailiff visited twice that day so i thought i would only be liable to pay the £42.50 ? i have now received letters from Bristow and Suitor (who are bloody awful ) saying that i owe £325 under the terms of the liability order regs 1992 blah blah i am in the process of writing a letter but would like some feedback about these fees and whether they look like they have been plucked from thin air and how have they reached the conclusion i owe £325?
Thanks
This council tax was regards a previous property, I never owed the money but had to prove this to the council to be honest i should have dealt with it a lot quicker than i did! ..... I managed to do this that day and get the debt written off all but £60 court costs which i have now paid. The bailiff also posted a notice of seizure of goods listing his 'charges' as follows £488.81 CTax 42.50 attendance to levy fees 41.00 + 37.00 Levy fee 24.50 Redemption of goods fees 180 Van.
Now i manged to provide receipts that none of the goods listed on the inventory belonged to me i also provided the bailiff with a copy of the tenancy agreement for the current property which is in my patners name. I therefore thought the levy/liability would now become invalid?
Now as far as i am concerned the bailiff visited twice that day so i thought i would only be liable to pay the £42.50 ? i have now received letters from Bristow and Suitor (who are bloody awful ) saying that i owe £325 under the terms of the liability order regs 1992 blah blah i am in the process of writing a letter but would like some feedback about these fees and whether they look like they have been plucked from thin air and how have they reached the conclusion i owe £325?
Thanks
Comment