Levied neighbours car on HIS drive
Despite me paying the council direct, after proving Jacobs had attempted fraud. The council sent Rosendales in.
They very misteriously visited my neighbor and slapped a levy on HIS car, parked on HIS drive and posted paperwork addressed to me through his letterbox.
I eventually received the paperwork (unsigned) threatening to cart away and sell my neighbour's car.
Bizarre I know. I emailed the council several times but all I got was I had to prove that the car was not mine and the additional fees still stand.
Well of course I had no intention to provide ownership details for someone else's car.
So left it to the council to contact the bailiff to figure out what was going on.
I knew really as the two addresses are so very similar (two No. 1s and two No 2s on the same block). However, it takes only one or two brain cells to work out.
Several weeks later I received an email from the council stating that the bailiff has discovered their error and handed the warrant right back to the council and the fees had been dropped. (I am still paying instalments to the council just as I have done all along).
I had previously sent a SAR to Jacobs as I wanted more evidence of fraud. They refused to supply any emails between them and the council, stating that they would be too hard to find. I believe that there is incriminating evidence in these emails.
I asked the council for additional information to the previous SAR, but they are demanding a further fee as they believe that the bailif and them are a separate entity. I am arguing that it is for the same account so they should share the fee.
Does anyone know the law on this and do I have to pay for a SAR for the same account twice?
David in Lincolnshire.
Despite me paying the council direct, after proving Jacobs had attempted fraud. The council sent Rosendales in.
They very misteriously visited my neighbor and slapped a levy on HIS car, parked on HIS drive and posted paperwork addressed to me through his letterbox.
I eventually received the paperwork (unsigned) threatening to cart away and sell my neighbour's car.
Bizarre I know. I emailed the council several times but all I got was I had to prove that the car was not mine and the additional fees still stand.
Well of course I had no intention to provide ownership details for someone else's car.
So left it to the council to contact the bailiff to figure out what was going on.
I knew really as the two addresses are so very similar (two No. 1s and two No 2s on the same block). However, it takes only one or two brain cells to work out.
Several weeks later I received an email from the council stating that the bailiff has discovered their error and handed the warrant right back to the council and the fees had been dropped. (I am still paying instalments to the council just as I have done all along).
I had previously sent a SAR to Jacobs as I wanted more evidence of fraud. They refused to supply any emails between them and the council, stating that they would be too hard to find. I believe that there is incriminating evidence in these emails.
I asked the council for additional information to the previous SAR, but they are demanding a further fee as they believe that the bailif and them are a separate entity. I am arguing that it is for the same account so they should share the fee.
Does anyone know the law on this and do I have to pay for a SAR for the same account twice?
David in Lincolnshire.
Comment