Sharma v Top Brands Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 1140 (10 November 2015)

[Legal Beagles]

More...

[Amethyst]

Re: Sharma v Top Brands Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 1140 (10 November 2015)

[MENTION=332]EXC[/MENTION] Yes, it is that Sharma. ( ref http://legalbeagles.info/top-brands-...4-august-2014/ )

''55. For those reasons the appeal must fail and no question arises as to whether the fraudulent intentions and conduct of Mr Rehman, Mr Tariq and Mr Patel, as the directing minds of MML, should be attributed to MML.''

[EXC]

Re: Sharma v Top Brands Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 1140 (10 November 2015)

Marvelous.

A complicated case but I spose it means she's going to have to cough up the half a million quid as per the initial judgment.

[Amethyst]

Re: Sharma v Top Brands Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 1140 (10 November 2015)

Sounds that way

[EXC]

Re: Sharma v Top Brands Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 1140 (10 November 2015)

Oddly enough when Tom did the advice for the Johnsons he included the illegallity defence becuase Sharma wasn't authorised to conduct claims activity when she sold their claim to Redhawk.