I received this response finally late today.
I’ve been passed the file to consider the timeline and the issues in the claim. I note that your permanent address is as below, and note your email address and mobile number as well. These match our records from the assignment of the debt to REDACTED in December 2021. Communication attempts were made by REDACTED to your Belfast address, mobile number and email address until a letter dated 30 June 2022 was returned from the Belfast address as addressee gone away.
This was received by REDACTED in August 2022. A trace was carried out and the address in REDACTED ENGLISH ADDRESS was found to be a match. Further post was sent to this address and not returned. Consequently this address was relied upon and both proceedings and the subsequent judgment are valid under 6.9 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Emails were being sent to you at this gmail address as late as October 2022 which were ignored. Had you spoken with REDACTED at all, this may have been avoided. In addition, a call was made to the phone number stated below on 4 January 2022 and REDACTED were told that this was the wrong number for you. This is clearly incorrect. As such we will not be agreeing to discontinuing the claim. The debt is due.
We are however willing to be reasonable, and if you can provide us with details of what may be affordable to you by way of monthly repayments, or if you have any offers to make as a lump sum payment against the debt then we are willing to compromise where possible. Should you decide to make the application to Court as intimated below then we must inform you that in the course of defending it there will be further costs of our time in doing so, which would be sought from you and added to the judgment sum in the event we successfully defend the application.
To avoid this as a possibility we welcome your proposals as a means of negotiating a mutually agreeable outcome
I’ve been passed the file to consider the timeline and the issues in the claim. I note that your permanent address is as below, and note your email address and mobile number as well. These match our records from the assignment of the debt to REDACTED in December 2021. Communication attempts were made by REDACTED to your Belfast address, mobile number and email address until a letter dated 30 June 2022 was returned from the Belfast address as addressee gone away.
This was received by REDACTED in August 2022. A trace was carried out and the address in REDACTED ENGLISH ADDRESS was found to be a match. Further post was sent to this address and not returned. Consequently this address was relied upon and both proceedings and the subsequent judgment are valid under 6.9 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Emails were being sent to you at this gmail address as late as October 2022 which were ignored. Had you spoken with REDACTED at all, this may have been avoided. In addition, a call was made to the phone number stated below on 4 January 2022 and REDACTED were told that this was the wrong number for you. This is clearly incorrect. As such we will not be agreeing to discontinuing the claim. The debt is due.
We are however willing to be reasonable, and if you can provide us with details of what may be affordable to you by way of monthly repayments, or if you have any offers to make as a lump sum payment against the debt then we are willing to compromise where possible. Should you decide to make the application to Court as intimated below then we must inform you that in the course of defending it there will be further costs of our time in doing so, which would be sought from you and added to the judgment sum in the event we successfully defend the application.
To avoid this as a possibility we welcome your proposals as a means of negotiating a mutually agreeable outcome
Comment