Hello all,
1st time posting here. I have a 2nd hand vehicle on finance, and I sent them a letter informing them that I wish to return the vehicle under the half rule. ( I have paid over half of the amount of the vehicle cost) That was in May. In the letter I stated that I would not be signing any forms, (as I have read that I should not and did not need to).
Fast forward 3 weeks and a recovery vehicle was sent to pick up the vehicle. The recovery driver man said I should sign the form he had from the finance company and he would take it away. I said I would not be doing this as I was advised not to. After a few phone calls the recovery man said he could not take it away as I had not signed the form.
I sent another letter to the finance company stating I am not signing any forms please pick the vehicle up. I then get a text from the third party recovery man stating that unless I sign the voluntary termination letter I would be taken to court by the finance company for a return of goods order plus court fees and recovery fees. This can't be correct can it? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in anticipation.
1st time posting here. I have a 2nd hand vehicle on finance, and I sent them a letter informing them that I wish to return the vehicle under the half rule. ( I have paid over half of the amount of the vehicle cost) That was in May. In the letter I stated that I would not be signing any forms, (as I have read that I should not and did not need to).
Fast forward 3 weeks and a recovery vehicle was sent to pick up the vehicle. The recovery driver man said I should sign the form he had from the finance company and he would take it away. I said I would not be doing this as I was advised not to. After a few phone calls the recovery man said he could not take it away as I had not signed the form.
I sent another letter to the finance company stating I am not signing any forms please pick the vehicle up. I then get a text from the third party recovery man stating that unless I sign the voluntary termination letter I would be taken to court by the finance company for a return of goods order plus court fees and recovery fees. This can't be correct can it? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in anticipation.
Comment