Hello, I need some advice please.
I recently VT'd my Corsa that was on finance as the Loan to car value was negative and depreciating by the month. I had passed the 50% payment stage, had the car collected and the damage report from Manheim carried out.
The manheim inspector had noticed on the car that there was a rippling in the paint down the passenger side, but at the time of completing the inspection, he told me not to sign his report and to contest it with GMAC, he was actually a very helpful guy.
Now, in Feb 2015, I had an accident in the car and the paintwork was damaged down the passenger side, and on the rear quarter of he car, this was repaired and re-sprayed by a garage that was arranged by my insurers at the time. I Still have copies of the invoice and a 3 year guarantee on the workmanship carried out on the car from the garage.
So, the case was now passed to Shoosmiths law firm, who act on before of GMAC with regards to the negotiations of the finance settlement. As instructed by the Manheim inspector, I contested the damage report and awaited a response. A month later, Shoosmiths contacted me and said that GMAC had dismissed my appeal against the repair charges and still found me liable for for £500 repair costs on the damage report, and advised me to contact the garage as they may offer to pay for the repairs. I contacted the garage and the guy said that he was disgusted with GMAC for pursuing the repair costs from me/them and that he would need to see the car before they did anything, but at this point, I had not had the car for 3 months. The guy at the garage was becoming irate (with GMAC, not me), and asked for me to email over the damage report that Manheim had provided showing the ripple in the repair work, but expressed that once the paperwork is all signed off, the work is considered as finished and was confused as to why it was only just being questioned now.
I have been given 2 weeks to report back to Shoosmiths on where the garage stand on this matter.
Any advice would be hugely appreciated.
I recently VT'd my Corsa that was on finance as the Loan to car value was negative and depreciating by the month. I had passed the 50% payment stage, had the car collected and the damage report from Manheim carried out.
The manheim inspector had noticed on the car that there was a rippling in the paint down the passenger side, but at the time of completing the inspection, he told me not to sign his report and to contest it with GMAC, he was actually a very helpful guy.
Now, in Feb 2015, I had an accident in the car and the paintwork was damaged down the passenger side, and on the rear quarter of he car, this was repaired and re-sprayed by a garage that was arranged by my insurers at the time. I Still have copies of the invoice and a 3 year guarantee on the workmanship carried out on the car from the garage.
So, the case was now passed to Shoosmiths law firm, who act on before of GMAC with regards to the negotiations of the finance settlement. As instructed by the Manheim inspector, I contested the damage report and awaited a response. A month later, Shoosmiths contacted me and said that GMAC had dismissed my appeal against the repair charges and still found me liable for for £500 repair costs on the damage report, and advised me to contact the garage as they may offer to pay for the repairs. I contacted the garage and the guy said that he was disgusted with GMAC for pursuing the repair costs from me/them and that he would need to see the car before they did anything, but at this point, I had not had the car for 3 months. The guy at the garage was becoming irate (with GMAC, not me), and asked for me to email over the damage report that Manheim had provided showing the ripple in the repair work, but expressed that once the paperwork is all signed off, the work is considered as finished and was confused as to why it was only just being questioned now.
I have been given 2 weeks to report back to Shoosmiths on where the garage stand on this matter.
Any advice would be hugely appreciated.
Comment