For an oral hearing, (bundle of documents required to be sent by the claimant),
where the claimant puts their challenge /files their Bundle containing their argument in a written document
and the defendant does a skeleton argument against the claimants argument bundle
(Judge is a Judge HHJ)
================================================== ====
If the bundle is sent to the defendant,
they then respond to this bundle with their skeleton argument
and this Claimant bundle is sent to the court (as requested)
If the bundle sent to the COURT contains the same documents as sent in the defendants bundle
BUT this court bundle has 'more' documents on,
(so basically the court /judges bundle will have MORE documents to rely on,
which have NOT been included in the defendants' original bundle sent to them.
The MAIN parts of the hearing/dispute would be included in the defendants’ original bundle
- Just the Judges bundle would contain more documents, (which the defendant has NOT seen)
[QUESTIONS]
Then what is the worse case scenario that can happen? (from the claimants point of view)
EXAMPLE:
* The defendant can request the Hearing to be Stopped/postponed
on grounds of non proper disclosure of documents?
or the judge could still carry on the hearing on the basis that the 'additional' documents would be
disregarded, as the defendant has not got a copy of them ?
[QUESTION] What is the WORSE CASE SCENARIO that can happen, from the claimants’ point of view?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#
where the claimant puts their challenge /files their Bundle containing their argument in a written document
and the defendant does a skeleton argument against the claimants argument bundle
(Judge is a Judge HHJ)
================================================== ====
If the bundle is sent to the defendant,
they then respond to this bundle with their skeleton argument
and this Claimant bundle is sent to the court (as requested)
If the bundle sent to the COURT contains the same documents as sent in the defendants bundle
BUT this court bundle has 'more' documents on,
(so basically the court /judges bundle will have MORE documents to rely on,
which have NOT been included in the defendants' original bundle sent to them.
The MAIN parts of the hearing/dispute would be included in the defendants’ original bundle
- Just the Judges bundle would contain more documents, (which the defendant has NOT seen)
[QUESTIONS]
Then what is the worse case scenario that can happen? (from the claimants point of view)
EXAMPLE:
* The defendant can request the Hearing to be Stopped/postponed
on grounds of non proper disclosure of documents?
or the judge could still carry on the hearing on the basis that the 'additional' documents would be
disregarded, as the defendant has not got a copy of them ?
[QUESTION] What is the WORSE CASE SCENARIO that can happen, from the claimants’ point of view?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#