Hi i am new on here and looking for some much needed valid advice.
For a qualified solicitor to be able to act as to legally represent a client am i right to assume that a legitimate contract between both parties would have to be in place to (a) represent (b) instruct.
I had assumed the solicitor that had previously represented me as i had not reason to doubt otherwise had this in place but she is not providing what i would assume would be compulsory but not quite sure on request the paperwork/applications for LA that would have been documented and signed before she could represent me.
I am to say the least slightly confused and do not have a clue how a solicitor works under a contract so any advice would be appreciated as i am in the dark, THANKS ALL.:doggieyes::doggieyes:
For a qualified solicitor to be able to act as to legally represent a client am i right to assume that a legitimate contract between both parties would have to be in place to (a) represent (b) instruct.
I had assumed the solicitor that had previously represented me as i had not reason to doubt otherwise had this in place but she is not providing what i would assume would be compulsory but not quite sure on request the paperwork/applications for LA that would have been documented and signed before she could represent me.
I am to say the least slightly confused and do not have a clue how a solicitor works under a contract so any advice would be appreciated as i am in the dark, THANKS ALL.:doggieyes::doggieyes:
Comment