I bought my flat in April 2015, being one of 66 flats in the block. There is a retail underneath the block that is let and subject to a sub-lease, details unknown.
We were all aware that the developers had gone into administration and the block was therefore being marked by Savills on behalf of the administrators.
The final flat was sold I believe some three months ago and as a result, the freehold has gone to auction earlier this week with a guide price of around £300,00.
We are currently negotiating the Right To Manage, using local solicitors, and we have been given a completion date around the middle of January 2017 subject to no sustained objections from the current freeholder.
The block went under the hammer earlier this week for £395,000 which with all costs would mean a final price of around £418,000. From an observer in the auction, it was announced that the property is subject to a developing RTM application and there were no bidders in the room, bidding coming apparently from two undisclosed telephone bidders.
The residents now have some three weeks maximum to offer the same auction price and it is currently difficult to get all 66 residents to agree a formula to do this. AS such, I believe it is unlikely that will happen.
We all have 120 year leases with a ground rent of £250 each per annum. For the older residents, there is therefore little mileage in buying the freehold, except to have total control over the building and cease paying ground rent. The property was built to completion in 2010.
We consider the bid of £395,000 plus costs to be 'aggressive' based on the sole yield of the ground rent at some 4% per annum. Has anyone any experience of why such a bid should have been placed, bearing in mind the ground rent low yield ( we were told investors tend to go for 8% plus ) and what motives may exist here? Do some investors take a long term view of this? We are aware that the selling agents have to maximise the price by common law as the property is in receivership, but we all thought that might keep the price competitively low and some have even suggested subterfuge, if indeed that is likely.
All opinions will be welcome! Cheers ..
We were all aware that the developers had gone into administration and the block was therefore being marked by Savills on behalf of the administrators.
The final flat was sold I believe some three months ago and as a result, the freehold has gone to auction earlier this week with a guide price of around £300,00.
We are currently negotiating the Right To Manage, using local solicitors, and we have been given a completion date around the middle of January 2017 subject to no sustained objections from the current freeholder.
The block went under the hammer earlier this week for £395,000 which with all costs would mean a final price of around £418,000. From an observer in the auction, it was announced that the property is subject to a developing RTM application and there were no bidders in the room, bidding coming apparently from two undisclosed telephone bidders.
The residents now have some three weeks maximum to offer the same auction price and it is currently difficult to get all 66 residents to agree a formula to do this. AS such, I believe it is unlikely that will happen.
We all have 120 year leases with a ground rent of £250 each per annum. For the older residents, there is therefore little mileage in buying the freehold, except to have total control over the building and cease paying ground rent. The property was built to completion in 2010.
We consider the bid of £395,000 plus costs to be 'aggressive' based on the sole yield of the ground rent at some 4% per annum. Has anyone any experience of why such a bid should have been placed, bearing in mind the ground rent low yield ( we were told investors tend to go for 8% plus ) and what motives may exist here? Do some investors take a long term view of this? We are aware that the selling agents have to maximise the price by common law as the property is in receivership, but we all thought that might keep the price competitively low and some have even suggested subterfuge, if indeed that is likely.
All opinions will be welcome! Cheers ..
Comment