Having a discussion recently about the use of LLP after a displayed business name and how it look so much like a 'badge of honour' especially when it appears in 12 inch high metal lettering. Usual examples are for firms of solicitors and accountants and how the usage is becoming widespread.
MY simple understanding of this is that if such a firm is sued for negligence, then the liability is limited to the assets of the partnership only and not to any individual practising within that group, a bit like liabilities of a limited company.
But while some prospective punters may well perceive the nomenclature as bearing goodness ( 12 inch metallic letters do hit the spot ) out of ignorance, how exactly should the public view their engagement of such firms bearing LLP? With caution? Or simply with the view 'that's how things operate now'?
MY simple understanding of this is that if such a firm is sued for negligence, then the liability is limited to the assets of the partnership only and not to any individual practising within that group, a bit like liabilities of a limited company.
But while some prospective punters may well perceive the nomenclature as bearing goodness ( 12 inch metallic letters do hit the spot ) out of ignorance, how exactly should the public view their engagement of such firms bearing LLP? With caution? Or simply with the view 'that's how things operate now'?
Comment