Appreciate some advice on this one please.
Completed on the sale of my leasehold flat in April 2015 and pay the service charges, 6 monthly in advance, on the 1st January and the 1st July every year. These are fully up to date.
In the last week all the residents, there are 66 flats in our block, received a 'demand' for a Service Charge Deficit for the year 1st January 2015 to the 31st December 2015. I queried mine on the basis that I took legal possession of my flat in early April 2015 and was subsequently credited for the period 1st January through to the 9th April 2015.
However, it seems that I only received the credit on raising the query and it seems that the situation is the same for anyone who purchased during 2015, they have received no credit unless they have raised the same query. We all agree that smacks of poor management accountancy despite the fact that we pay through the nose for it.
My query however related to how the demand was apportioned. The block is a relative new build, built in 2010 and due to poor initial sales, many of the flats were rented to create income while the sales office continue to offer them all for sale. The managing agents have told me that if my flat had been previously owned by the freeholder ( i.e. rented with no previous owner ), then my credit would come from application to the freeholder for their earlier share of the service charge. They go on to state that if my flat had been previously owned, then, and I quote their response :
"Just to confirm (based on your note about other leaseholders having this same query) – this would depend on who the previous owner of the flat was. If it was the freeholder, as it is in your case, then we can arrange the credit for their proportion and charge them separately. However if it was another owner, then the current owner would need to contact their own solicitor to enquire whether a retention was held by the buyers solicitor to pay for such charges. If not, then the current leaseholder would be responsible for the full payment".
Is that the correct view here?
Completed on the sale of my leasehold flat in April 2015 and pay the service charges, 6 monthly in advance, on the 1st January and the 1st July every year. These are fully up to date.
In the last week all the residents, there are 66 flats in our block, received a 'demand' for a Service Charge Deficit for the year 1st January 2015 to the 31st December 2015. I queried mine on the basis that I took legal possession of my flat in early April 2015 and was subsequently credited for the period 1st January through to the 9th April 2015.
However, it seems that I only received the credit on raising the query and it seems that the situation is the same for anyone who purchased during 2015, they have received no credit unless they have raised the same query. We all agree that smacks of poor management accountancy despite the fact that we pay through the nose for it.
My query however related to how the demand was apportioned. The block is a relative new build, built in 2010 and due to poor initial sales, many of the flats were rented to create income while the sales office continue to offer them all for sale. The managing agents have told me that if my flat had been previously owned by the freeholder ( i.e. rented with no previous owner ), then my credit would come from application to the freeholder for their earlier share of the service charge. They go on to state that if my flat had been previously owned, then, and I quote their response :
"Just to confirm (based on your note about other leaseholders having this same query) – this would depend on who the previous owner of the flat was. If it was the freeholder, as it is in your case, then we can arrange the credit for their proportion and charge them separately. However if it was another owner, then the current owner would need to contact their own solicitor to enquire whether a retention was held by the buyers solicitor to pay for such charges. If not, then the current leaseholder would be responsible for the full payment".
Is that the correct view here?
Comment