Tweet
I have a court hearing in a couple of weeks. In the meantime one of the claimants launched an unprovoked attack on my son and verbal attack on myself. Police called. Claimant arrested and bailed to attend interview at local police station. After being interviewed under caution the police decided NFA due to lack of independent witnesses. Should add - police were called on evening of assault and saw injuries caused to my son! Anyway - claimant issued with a first instance harassment warning and warned about his behaviour towards us. How relevant is this to the court case [see summary below - full story on another thread] and should we write to the court in advance or just bring it up at the hearing as evidence of their bad behaviour? Or is the harassment warning not worth the paper it's written on?
Thanks for any advice.
[in summary claimants want loadsofcash in respect of our trespass by scaffolding down the alleyway between our houses which they own but over which we have right of way - scaffolding up for 4 weeks, no damage - we had objective justification as we needed to repair damp to our loft.......they led us to believe the scaffolding would be contained within the party wall award due but when it arrived it wasn't in and we faced yet more delays so went ahead].
Thanks for any advice.
[in summary claimants want loadsofcash in respect of our trespass by scaffolding down the alleyway between our houses which they own but over which we have right of way - scaffolding up for 4 weeks, no damage - we had objective justification as we needed to repair damp to our loft.......they led us to believe the scaffolding would be contained within the party wall award due but when it arrived it wasn't in and we faced yet more delays so went ahead].
