• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

pre 2007 credit agreements

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pre 2007 credit agreements

    hi all new to the forums seeking advice been to a few forums but the info seems conflicting so i am now more confused then i was before i started..

    I have an alleged debt to barclaycard that defaulted in 2012 the debt was sold on to various dca and now resides with robinsonway who now have got Howard cohen solicitors to threaten pending legal action to gain a CCJ..

    I applied for a cca in 2014 and got a reconstituted agreement minus a signature from barclaycard the agreement was taken out in 2002.. i have been led to believe as its pre april 2007 that the agreement can not be inforced through court as it isnt a signed copy

    how accurate is this information if a CCJ is raised against me i will have to file for bankruptcy and i would rather not do that


    did post this in the other forum but think might been wrong place as it hadnt been looked at in a few days
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

    Good afternoon,

    Robinson Way usually act for their parent company is that the case here?
    Send a CCA request to RW, but please follow the following steps as RW et al / Cohen, tend to deliberately complicate CCA request.

    1. Use a postal order for £1 clearly marked on both sides " For Statutory Fee Only" as RW have the habit of allocating fees to the debt.

    2 Copy both sides of the PO and keep for your record.

    3. There is a template for the request in the green box above. Given the abuse by RW I suggest adding the following to the template.

    " Please take note the attached £1.00 Postal Order No..................................: is for the statutory fee for the request for information made under the provisions of sections 77/78 of CCA 1974 it is not and must not be allocated as a payment to the alleged debt;
    If the fee is not required it must be returned to me forthwith.

    RW has 12 + 2 working days to comply.

    RW could attempt to use a reconstituted agreement but it would be a judges decision as to the merits of the recon.

    Did you receive a Default Notice from Barclaycard or its in house collectors Mercers Debt collection?

    Mercers issued DN's on its own letter head not Barclays and so were invalid.

    nem

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

      hi thankyou for answering

      I requested a CCa back in 2014 via MKDP and had one come through just about make parts out badly photo copied and its unsigned ..
      no idea on the default as i havent made a payment in 4 years


      Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
      Good afternoon,

      Robinson Way usually act for their parent company is that the case here?
      Send a CCA request to RW, but please follow the following steps as RW et al / Cohen, tend to deliberately complicate CCA request.

      1. Use a postal order for £1 clearly marked on both sides " For Statutory Fee Only" as RW have the habit of allocating fees to the debt.

      2 Copy both sides of the PO and keep for your record.

      3. There is a template for the request in the green box above. Given the abuse by RW I suggest adding the following to the template.

      " Please take note the attached £1.00 Postal Order No..................................: is for the statutory fee for the request for information made under the provisions of sections 77/78 of CCA 1974 it is not and must not be allocated as a payment to the alleged debt;
      If the fee is not required it must be returned to me forthwith.

      RW has 12 + 2 working days to comply.

      RW could attempt to use a reconstituted agreement but it would be a judges decision as to the merits of the recon.

      Did you receive a Default Notice from Barclaycard or its in house collectors Mercers Debt collection?

      Mercers issued DN's on its own letter head not Barclays and so were invalid.

      nem

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

        A recon agreement does not need signature.

        A recon agreement must be easily legible in all parts, and have the following components.

        1. Your name and address as it was when the account was opened.

        2. The creditors name and address as it was when the account was opened.

        3. The terms & conditions relevant when the account was opened.

        4. The T's & C's at closure.

        5. Any other documents mentioned in the T's & C's.

        6. A Current statement of the account (Not an historical statement.)

        I suggest you check credit reference file to check when the default was registered, you can check Noddle free online.

        A default notice would have been sent probably 2 - 3 months after your last payment.

        nem

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

          I am already on experian it defaulted according to MKDP in feb 2012.... barclaycard shows a settlement date of 2013 ..the account was opened in 2002

          I was under the impression because of certain other forums that a agreement that old would need to be signed if they took me too court which they intend to do

          its not easily readable as some of its blurred also as far as i can tell it doesnt have the interest rate i was given when the account was first opened not usre if that even makes any difference just pointing it out ...

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

            Originally posted by jobe1972 View Post
            I am already on experian it defaulted according to MKDP in feb 2012.... barclaycard shows a settlement date of 2013 ..the account was opened in 2002

            I was under the impression because of certain other forums that a agreement that old would need to be signed if they took me too court which they intend to do
            Much has change with the ability to provide recon agreements and the area is open to challenge and change but I would always push for the
            " true copy of the signed and executed agreement " on pre April 2007 agreements.

            nem

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

              well as i said i had a threatening letter that they will seek a CCJ ..would any of the following help me with a defence if that is the course they go down
              1 cant read half of what they sent (i can upload the pdf of the scanned docs)
              2 It isnt a signed copy
              3 the interest listed is higher then i would of had on the card at the time

              also is it worth telling robinsonway that a true copy of the agreement was never sent ?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                Originally posted by jobe1972 View Post
                well as i said i had a threatening letter that they will seek a CCJ ..would any of the following help me with a defence if that is the course they go down
                1 cant read half of what they sent (i can upload the pdf of the scanned docs)
                2 It isnt a signed copy
                3 the interest listed is higher then i would of had on the card at the time

                also is it worth telling robinsonway that a true copy of the agreement was never sent ?
                "Keep your powder dry"!! don't do their work for them!!

                An agreement recon/or actual copy must be easily legible in all parts.

                Yes please let us see the docs.

                nem

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                  think i have attached it correctly
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                    Originally posted by jobe1972 View Post
                    think i have attached it correctly

                    Are there two sets of terms and conditions?
                    Is your name and address on the them as it was when the account was opened?

                    nem

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                      the first blacked out square on 3rd image was my address when the agreement was taken out...the three documents that follow says credit agreement (one of the images was duplicated by mistake) and i assume its terms and conditions but i cant read it...too blurry..then you have the 3 pages or so titled barclaycard conditions that has my new address listed

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                        Originally posted by jobe1972 View Post
                        the first blacked out square on 3rd image was my address when the agreement was taken out...the three documents that follow says credit agreement (one of the images was duplicated by mistake) and i assume its terms and conditions but i cant read it...too blurry..then you have the 3 pages or so titled barclaycard conditions that has my new address listed
                        To my mind the recon fails on legibility and terms and conditions and would unacceptable in court.

                        nem

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                          does it fail on the terms and conditions because the original address isnt used on all parts? i am way out of my depth as is let alone if i do get a claims through for a court hearing and i attempt to defend against it couldnt afford the debt as it let alone when they try to add the 2-3k extra there hoping for

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                            Originally posted by jobe1972 View Post
                            does it fail on the terms and conditions because the original address isnt used on all parts? i am way out of my depth as is let alone if i do get a claims through for a court hearing and i attempt to defend against it couldnt afford the debt as it let alone when they try to add the 2-3k extra there hoping for
                            It does not appear to have enough T's & C's for the two sets one at opening one at closure.

                            I still suspect that the default notice may be defective.

                            nem

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: pre 2007 credit agreements

                              Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
                              It does not appear to have enough T's & C's for the two sets one at opening one at closure.

                              I still suspect that the default notice may be defective.

                              nem
                              thankyou in either case i wouldnt have any idea

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X