• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

    Hi

    I’m new to this forum so ‘hello’ & I’d be very grateful for any thoughts that people have.

    In summary I’m in dispute with a local Estate Agency.

    I allege that, in July 2014, employees of the agency caused £300 of damage to the bodywork of my car.

    Initially the agency did not respond to my complaints & requests for compensation. Eventually they contacted me by ‘phone to deny liability and refuse to put their position in writing. I referred the matter to The Property Ombudsman Service (TPOS) who was able to conclude that the agency had failed to respond properly to my complaints, but they were unable to conclude that the agency had caused the damage to my car based on the documentation I provided. At that stage the agency made me an offer (via TPOS) of £150 to settle all aspects of my complaints. To date I’ve not taken-up the offer because it doesn’t cover my losses.

    So I’m currently deciding what to do next. A few weeks ago I sent a carefully worded ‘Letter Before Action’. The Estate Agency replied (i.e. their first written response to me) to once again deny all liability for the damage caused to my car. They failed to refer to any of the specific points in my letter and simply defended themselves by way of a statement to say their staff are fully security-checked professionals who would never behave in ‘that way’. They also stated that the offer of £150 was purely in relation to their mishandling of my complaint. They also stated that my claim seemed opportunistic. They also stated that they’d be referring the matter to their solicitors.

    I was intending to make a claim against them which would hopefully proceed through the small claims process. I’ve discussed this course of action with TPOS and with legal advice/advisors via my Trades Union both of whom were broadly supportive based on the evidence I could provide. I’ve already drafted the claim form and was going to submit it last week but then I got cold feet and decided to check whether I’d done enough and got enough evidence to make my case as strong as possible in court.

    So, my questions can be condensed thus...

    1) Are there any other avenues that I should pursue before proceeding to make a formal claim/court action? I’ve tried to follow pre-action protocol by attempting to settle the matter directly with the defendants and attempted mediation via TPOS. The defendants have had plenty of time to respond fully. I’ve considered arbitration which it seems would be too expensive given the amount I’m claiming for (i.e. £300). The ADR specialists I’ve spoken to have suggested further mediation (at £100 +VAT for 2hrs) but the matter has already been mediated by TPOS without successful resolution and as far as I know I may be offered free mediation by the courts later in the small claims process (which I would happily participate in). I suspect we’re at an impasse that can only be broken by a judgement by someone with authority.

    2) Is my case strong enough to present convincingly at a court hearing? I have photographs of the damage to my car. I have a reliable witness (who’s given a witness statement) who saw my car being manhandled roughly by 2 of the Estate Agency workers. The problem is that no one actually saw the damage being done – they’re simply able to say that they witnessed the car being treated in a way that could have definitely caused the damage. Also the Estate Agency have not admitted in writing that they touched my car (although they have done so verbally) – my fear is that in a court hearing they could simply deny ever having touched the car and then it’s the word of my witness against theirs.


    A bit more info. to put all this in context...

    I live in a house that’s been divided into flats. One of the flats is let to the aforementioned Estate Agent and they use it to house social tenants temporarily. Back in July 2014 the tenant in this flat was a hoarder who failed to pay his rent and was evicted by the Estate Agent. During the eviction all of the tenant’s hoarded possessions were placed on the driveway of the house alongside my car (which was untaxed, uninsured and SORN at the time). The Estate Agency hired a skip to clear–up the hoarded rubbish. I returned from work one evening to find that my locked car had been dragged from its position on the driveway and left on the side of the road. The skip had been left in its place. There had been no communication with me about this beforehand (although 2 days later one of the agency staff told me that they’d moved my car – I pointed-out the damage which he denied doing – accusing me of lying that it wasn’t there beforehand – I do have some blurry photos taken beforehand which show no signs of damage). So my car had been left untaxed & uninsured on the public road with £300 worth of new dents in the bodywork. I was fuming!

    I’ve received a fair amount of legal advice about the matter and essentially it seems that all my evidence is circumstantial and any ruling would be on the basis of probabilities. My witness is one of several neighbours in the street who saw my car being manually bounced, pushed & dragged across the road by 2 men working for the Estate Agent’s property management team (at one stage they asked him whether they could borrow a jack from him). I’ve been advised that the photos and the witness statement should be convincing enough for a magistrate... but recently I’ve been afraid that the Estate Agent is going to deny that their workers ever touched the car and I’ve actually got no written proof that they did. They’ve tried to blame it on the skip company but there’s no evidence to support this and surely if the skip company were working under the direction of the agency and the agency workers were present when the skip was put into position then the agency are still liable as it was their ‘project’?

    Anyway – thanks for reading if you’ve got this far – any informed thoughts or constructive comments would be warmly welcomed!

    JulianS
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

    Hi and welcome.

    Well it really is your decision.
    You have been advised (by whom?) that your evidence would probably be sufficient to convince a judge.
    We haven't seen your evidence, but it seems convincing enough from what you say.
    The agency can only deny the matter, but you do have a credible witness regarding the manhandling of the vehicle.

    The only caveat I have is regarding the value of your vehicle. If it is less than £300..........

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

      I think you have done everything possible to get this resolved and court is the only route you have left to get any form of resolution.

      I have photographs of the damage to my car. I have a reliable witness (who’s given a witness statement) who saw my car being manhandled roughly by 2 of the Estate Agency workers
      Good.

      Any ruling in county court would be based on balance of probabilities. It would be a civil claim for the damage to the vehicle caused by the actions of the estate agency.

      You will probably have to explain why you car was sorned and on the drive at the time. Also were you entitled to park on the drive, where did other residents park, was there any notice given to any other residents about the skip etc etc, when it comes to Witness statements further along.

      You should send the estate agent a formal letter before action giving 7 or 14 days before you issue court proceedings. Though seems you have already done that.
      A few weeks ago I sent a carefully worded ‘Letter Before Action’. The Estate Agency replied (i.e. their first written response to me) to once again deny all liability for the damage caused to my car. They failed to refer to any of the specific points in my letter and simply defended themselves by way of a statement to say their staff are fully security-checked professionals who would never behave in ‘that way’. They also stated that the offer of £150 was purely in relation to their mishandling of my complaint. They also stated that my claim seemed opportunistic. They also stated that they’d be referring the matter to their solicitors.
      SO maybe post that letter up ?

      Do you want to post a copy of the draft you have made for your claim form up ?
      #staysafestayhome

      Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

      Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

        Hmmm........reasonably cheap to start a court action.

        & the courts have a free mediation service...............
        CAVEAT LECTOR

        This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

        You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
        Cohen, Herb


        There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
        gets his brain a-going.
        Phelps, C. C.


        "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
        The last words of John Sedgwick

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

          Thanks for your response Des8

          Originally posted by des8 View Post
          Hi and welcome.
          Ta! - I'm very happy to be here - I should have found this forum years ago.

          Originally posted by des8 View Post
          You have been advised (by whom?)
          Previously I'd been getting advice from a firm of solicitors as part of a 'free legal advice' offer from my Trade Union.

          Originally posted by des8 View Post
          The only caveat I have is regarding the value of your vehicle. If it is less than £300...
          Indeed that's a thought that has frequently occurred to me but I was/am so angry about the whole business...

          Another issue is the length of time that has elapsed since the incident occurred - I did take a 9 month gap (because I was ill) without taking action to push things forward but other than that it's taken ages to gather evidence & explore other avenues (e.g. ADR) - I'm not sure how that would affect things in court - I know that strictly speaking it shouldn't but...

          ATB

          JulianS

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

            Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
            Hmmm........reasonably cheap to start a court action.

            & the courts have a free mediation service...............
            So I guess you're saying go for it?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

              Thanks for your thoughtful response Amethyst (and thanks to you & others for taking the time to read my long, detailed initial post - I did want to make it shorter but also wanted to give as much detail as possible - a tricky balance...)

              Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
              I think you have done everything possible to get this resolved
              It certainly feels that way - that's one of the reasons it's taken so long (it's over 18mnths since the initial incident) - but during my research the message came over very strongly that I would have to convince a judge/magistrate that I had done all I could to resolve the matter before going to court...

              Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
              You will probably have to explain why you car was sorned and on the drive at the time. Also were you entitled to park on the drive, where did other residents park, was there any notice given to any other residents about the skip
              It was (and still is) on the driveway of the house where I live - it's where the vehicle is kept and the landlord is fine with that. It was SORNED because I'd been made redundant a few weeks beforehand and no longer needed the car to get to & from work - I live in London and only needed the car to commute. I'd just started a new job that didn't require a car to use for commuting so, since I'm on a low income, I'd cancelled the tax & insurance and been refunded. I was waiting to settle into the new job before deciding what to do with the car next.

              I'm the only resident with a car.

              The only notice that I had was a crude handwritten notice on my door a week beforehand asking me to move my vehicle (not dates given, no clue who the note was from etc.)- I did move it but then after a few days I had to move it back - so there was a gap of about a week between the notice and the skip arriving. I kept the notice as evidence if needed.

              I'm wondering why this is relevant? Surely I had every right to keep my vehicle on the driveway outside of my house (with the landlord's permission) whether it was SORN or not? Surely I had every right to refuse to move it (not that I was properly asked) to make way for a skip. Surely the other party could have put the skip on the side of the road and left my vehicle where it was?

              Basically (to me) it's like one of your neighbours comes along and drags your car onto the road because they want to put a skip in its place to clear-up their rubbish - surely they had no right or authority to move my car without permission and the moment they touched it they should have known & observed their duty of care?

              Sorry if that all sounds a bit abrasive - it's not aimed at you...:tinysmile_twink_t2:

              Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
              So maybe post that letter up?
              OK - thanks for the suggestion... I'll post-up the letter before action, their response and the draft claim form later if that's OK - I need to redact them all first and I also need to go shopping and do some other stuff...

              Many thanks for your help thus far...

              ATB

              JulianS

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                Originally posted by JulianS View Post
                Hi

                I’m new to this forum so ‘hello’ & I’d be very grateful for any thoughts that people have.

                In summary I’m in dispute with a local Estate Agency.

                I allege that, in July 2014, employees of the agency caused £300 of damage to the bodywork of my car.

                Initially the agency did not respond to my complaints & requests for compensation. Eventually they contacted me by ‘phone to deny liability and refuse to put their position in writing. I referred the matter to The Property Ombudsman Service (TPOS) who was able to conclude that the agency had failed to respond properly to my complaints, but they were unable to conclude that the agency had caused the damage to my car based on the documentation I provided. At that stage the agency made me an offer (via TPOS) of £150 to settle all aspects of my complaints. To date I’ve not taken-up the offer because it doesn’t cover my losses.

                So I’m currently deciding what to do next. A few weeks ago I sent a carefully worded ‘Letter Before Action’. The Estate Agency replied (i.e. their first written response to me) to once again deny all liability for the damage caused to my car. They failed to refer to any of the specific points in my letter and simply defended themselves by way of a statement to say their staff are fully security-checked professionals who would never behave in ‘that way’. They also stated that the offer of £150 was purely in relation to their mishandling of my complaint. They also stated that my claim seemed opportunistic. They also stated that they’d be referring the matter to their solicitors.

                I was intending to make a claim against them which would hopefully proceed through the small claims process. I’ve discussed this course of action with TPOS and with legal advice/advisors via my Trades Union both of whom were broadly supportive based on the evidence I could provide. I’ve already drafted the claim form and was going to submit it last week but then I got cold feet and decided to check whether I’d done enough and got enough evidence to make my case as strong as possible in court.

                So, my questions can be condensed thus...

                1) Are there any other avenues that I should pursue before proceeding to make a formal claim/court action? I’ve tried to follow pre-action protocol by attempting to settle the matter directly with the defendants and attempted mediation via TPOS. The defendants have had plenty of time to respond fully. I’ve considered arbitration which it seems would be too expensive given the amount I’m claiming for (i.e. £300). The ADR specialists I’ve spoken to have suggested further mediation (at £100 +VAT for 2hrs) but the matter has already been mediated by TPOS without successful resolution and as far as I know I may be offered free mediation by the courts later in the small claims process (which I would happily participate in). I suspect we’re at an impasse that can only be broken by a judgement by someone with authority.

                2) Is my case strong enough to present convincingly at a court hearing? I have photographs of the damage to my car. I have a reliable witness (who’s given a witness statement) who saw my car being manhandled roughly by 2 of the Estate Agency workers. The problem is that no one actually saw the damage being done – they’re simply able to say that they witnessed the car being treated in a way that could have definitely caused the damage. Also the Estate Agency have not admitted in writing that they touched my car (although they have done so verbally) – my fear is that in a court hearing they could simply deny ever having touched the car and then it’s the word of my witness against theirs.


                A bit more info. to put all this in context...

                I live in a house that’s been divided into flats. One of the flats is let to the aforementioned Estate Agent and they use it to house social tenants temporarily. Back in July 2014 the tenant in this flat was a hoarder who failed to pay his rent and was evicted by the Estate Agent. During the eviction all of the tenant’s hoarded possessions were placed on the driveway of the house alongside my car (which was untaxed, uninsured and SORN at the time). The Estate Agency hired a skip to clear–up the hoarded rubbish. I returned from work one evening to find that my locked car had been dragged from its position on the driveway and left on the side of the road. The skip had been left in its place. There had been no communication with me about this beforehand (although 2 days later one of the agency staff told me that they’d moved my car – I pointed-out the damage which he denied doing – accusing me of lying that it wasn’t there beforehand – I do have some blurry photos taken beforehand which show no signs of damage). So my car had been left untaxed & uninsured on the public road with £300 worth of new dents in the bodywork. I was fuming!

                I’ve received a fair amount of legal advice about the matter and essentially it seems that all my evidence is circumstantial and any ruling would be on the basis of probabilities. My witness is one of several neighbours in the street who saw my car being manually bounced, pushed & dragged across the road by 2 men working for the Estate Agent’s property management team (at one stage they asked him whether they could borrow a jack from him). I’ve been advised that the photos and the witness statement should be convincing enough for a magistrate... but recently I’ve been afraid that the Estate Agent is going to deny that their workers ever touched the car and I’ve actually got no written proof that they did. They’ve tried to blame it on the skip company but there’s no evidence to support this and surely if the skip company were working under the direction of the agency and the agency workers were present when the skip was put into position then the agency are still liable as it was their ‘project’?

                Anyway – thanks for reading if you’ve got this far – any informed thoughts or constructive comments would be warmly welcomed!

                JulianS
                I note you let the property to the estate agents. You may be able to sue the estate agents for damages if the driveway where your car was parked was part of your land, under the Occupier Liability act 1957 as permitted occupiers, or under the Occupier Liability Act 1984 as trespassers. Let me explain the latter, the estate agent only had permission to be there in accordance with your contract, ie your covenant. You may be able to sue in contract as breach of covenant. However, removing your car from its place is the point of trespass for said Act remedy. Look into a land tribunal remedy for breach of covenant remedy or court remedy for Occupier liability.

                Ombudsman: "unable to conclude that the agency had caused the damage to my car based on the documentation I provided"

                Which employees? Which one owed you a duty, breached it, and is solely to blame?
                You cannot sue each and every employee for damages, can you? The onus is on you to prove which one caused the damage? You can't sue the employer indirectly either for the actions of his/ her employees as you simply do not know which employees caused what damage (causation test).

                "have a reliable witness (who’s given a witness statement) who saw my car being manhandled roughly by 2 of the Estate Agency workers. The problem is that no one actually saw the damage being done – they’re simply able to say that they witnessed the car being treated in a way that could have definitely caused the damage. Also the Estate Agency have not admitted in writing that they touched my car (although they have done so verbally) – my fear is that in a court hearing they could simply deny ever having touched the car and then it’s the word of my witness against theirs."

                What did the witness see - a reliable witness statement is only good if it is strong, yours is far from it.
                Last edited by Openlaw15; 6th February 2016, 12:08:PM. Reason: typo

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                  If you're going to take it to court then these are points the other side may raise in their defence, or the judge may raise them, so you need to go through and ensure you have the right answers to counter the other side's argument. So look at ANY potential weaknesses in your case and how you will deal with them BEFORE starting the court action.

                  On the other hand, they could just pay up as soon as they receive the court papers....

                  but best to be prepared.
                  #staysafestayhome

                  Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                  Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                    Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
                    If you're going to take it to court then these are points the other side may raise in their defence, or the judge may raise them, so you need to go through and ensure you have the right answers to counter the other side's argument. So look at ANY potential weaknesses in your case and how you will deal with them BEFORE starting the court action.

                    On the other hand, they could just pay up as soon as they receive the court papers....

                    but best to be prepared.
                    Duty, breach, causation is what the OP has to prove ...there is no case to answer on a normal tort in my view, but it's possible under what I stated in the above remedies.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                      Thanks for your response Openlaw - some tough, blunt but useful comments - I'll do my best to respond

                      Originally posted by Openlaw15 View Post
                      I note you let the property to the estate agents.
                      I don't own the property - I'm simply a neighbouring tenant living in the property alongside the folk that the Estate Agents put into the studio flat that they also rent in the house. I never said that I owned the property (did I?).

                      Originally posted by Openlaw15 View Post
                      Ombudsman: "unable to conclude that the agency had caused the damage to my car based on the documentation I provided"
                      OK - here's the actual text from TPOS:
                      As discussed, the Ombudsman does not regulate the industry; he provides a form of alternative dispute resolution. Where there is a disputed conversation or action, the Ombudsman will make a decision based on the documentation provided and what is fair and reasonable in the circumstances. Based on the correspondence provided, it does not appear that the Ombudsman would be able to conclude that (name of estate agents removed) did damage your car and therefore, I do not consider the Ombudsman would be able to support this complaint or make an award of compensation for the damage caused. However, what is evident, is (name of estate agents removed) shortcomings when it came to address your complaint and respond as per their obligations under the TPO Code of Practice...

                      ...We have discussed your option to pursue legal action against Tower Estates via the small claims court. Alternatively, you may progress your complaint through this Office for formal review.
                      Moving on...

                      Originally posted by Openlaw15 View Post
                      You can't sue the employer indirectly either for the actions of his/ her employees as you simply do not know which employees caused what damage (causation test).
                      This is something I've thought (& worried about) - I'll check it out but in the meantime if anyone else can confirm this then I'd be very grateful. - It's not something that's been pointed-out to me by the solicitors that I've previously received legal advice from about the matter.

                      Originally posted by Openlaw15 View Post
                      What did the witness see - a reliable witness statement is only good if it is strong, yours is far from it.
                      I'll post-up the redacted witness statement later - I'd be grateful if you'd take a look to confirm this judgement then :tinysmile_twink_t2:

                      As stated at the top of this post - I'm grateful for your thoughts Openlaw - perhaps you can give a (constructive) opinion as to how you'd proceed under the circumstances - given that I arrived home from work one evening to find my car on the side of the road with £300 of damage done to it and a skip put in it's place - with a worker gleefully telling me the next day that they'd had to move my car?

                      ATB

                      JulianS
                      Last edited by JulianS; 6th February 2016, 13:12:PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                        Originally posted by JulianS View Post
                        Thanks for your response Openlaw - some tough, blunt but useful comments - I'll do my best to respond



                        I don't own the property - I'm simply a neighbouring tenant living in the property alongside the folk that the Estate Agents put into the studio flat that they also rent in the house. I never said that I owned the property (did I?).



                        OK - here's the actual text from TPOS:


                        Moving on...



                        This is something I've thought (& worried about) - I'll check it out but in the meantime if anyone else can confirm this then I'd be very grateful. - It's not something that's been pointed-out to me by the solicitors that I've previously received legal advice from about the matter.


                        I'll post-up the redacted witness statement later - I'd be grateful if you'd give your judgement about it then :tinysmile_twink_t2:

                        As stated at the top of this post - I'm grateful for your thoughts Openlaw - perhaps you can give a (constructive) opinion as to how you'd proceed under the circumstances - given that I arrived home from work one evening to find my car on the side of the road with £300 of damage done to it and a skip put in it's place - with a worker gleefully telling me the next day that they'd had to move my car?

                        ATB

                        JulianS
                        I studied tort law when doing a qualifying law degree and I cannot see you having a successful claim in ordinary tort, but possibly you may have one under specialist areas such as Occupier Liability as i have aforementioned. The Legal Beagle community are ordinarily experts in consumer situations but tort law is specialist and occupier liability is no exception. Unless others have studied tort in depth at qualifying law degree level whilst their comments may be useful for context they're still generally lay view and or pertain to anecdotal views. I can only give you my opinion and have done so. Yes by all means I will look at your witness statement. If your car was parked on land belonging to the house owner you may have a claim against the owner or against whom the flat was let out to, ie the estate agent (other occupier), as far am aware.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                          Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
                          So look at ANY potential weaknesses in your case and how you will deal with them BEFORE starting the court action.
                          That's what I'm trying to do - and I really do value your (& others' input) on the matter - I guess I just sent the letter before action a bit prematurely - the thing is that this is dragging-on so long and I'm anxious to get it resolved - I'm aware that the length of time it's taking may affect the outcome if it goes to court.

                          Also, given the value of the claim is only £300 and the car is probably worth less than that I'm wondering whether it's worth it (despite all the effort I've gone to so far)...

                          The way things are going it might be best for me to go back and see whether the £150 offer is still on the table and if so accept it... otherwise drop the whole business... I don't feel very comfortable with backtracking on a letter before claim but I'm hoping there's a way of managing it without compromising my credibility &dignity too much...

                          Right now I feel like giving-up - I suffer from anxiety & depression, I'm on a low income, my witness statement is weak, my case is weak etc. etc. I should probably go out for a walk and do my shopping!

                          I'll post-up those documents later anyway...

                          ATB

                          JulianS
                          Last edited by JulianS; 6th February 2016, 13:42:PM. Reason: To rearrange paragraphs

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                            Originally posted by JulianS View Post
                            That's what I'm trying to do - and I really do value your (& others' input) on the matter - I guess I just sent the letter before action a bit prematurely - the thing is that this is dragging-on so long and I'm anxious to get it resolved - I'm aware that the length of time it's taking may affect the outcome if it goes to court.

                            Also, given the value of the claim is only £300 and the car is probably worth less than that I'm wondering whether it's worth it (despite all the effort I've gone to so far)...

                            Right now I feel like giving-up - I suffer from anxiety & depression, I'm on a low income, my witness statement is weak, my case is weak etc. etc.

                            The way things are going it might be best for me to go back and see whether the £150 offer is still on the table and if so accept it... otherwise drop the whole business... I don't feel very comfortable with backtracking on a letter before claim but I'm hoping there's a way of managing it without compromising my credibility &dignity too much...

                            I'll post-up those documents later anyway...

                            ATB

                            JulianS
                            How long was your car parked there without tax, insurance, ie on SORN basis? It matters because it's whether the occupier acted reasonably, ie you had notice that you need to move your car. However the occupier still has to act reasonably.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Damage to my car – Is my case enough to proceed to court or is there more to do?

                              Originally posted by Openlaw15 View Post
                              ...If your car was parked on land belonging to the house owner you may have a claim against the owner or against whom the flat was let out to, ie the estate agent (other occupier), as far am aware.
                              I'm a bit confused - isn't that what I'm doing? i.e. exploring the possibility of a claim against the Estate Agent (other occupier)? I've got the impression that my case is all a bit weak.

                              Surely I'd still have to address your good point about the causation test i.e...

                              Originally posted by Openlaw15 View Post
                              Which employees? Which one owed you a duty, breached it, and is solely to blame?
                              You cannot sue each and every employee for damages, can you? The onus is on you to prove which one caused the damage? You can't sue the employer indirectly either for the actions of his/ her employees as you simply do not know which employees caused what damage (causation test).
                              The above issue in my mind is now a critical, almost insurmountable weakness in my case...

                              Immediately after the incident I did call the landlords because I assumed that they were responsible for the whole eviction process - however they denied liability on the basis that they had little to do with the whole business - it was effectively a tenant (the Estate Agency) booting-out a (permitted) sub-tenant. This appeared to be implicitly confirmed in later discussions I had with legal advisors and TPOS.

                              Originally posted by Openlaw15 View Post
                              How long was your car parked there without tax, insurance, ie on SORN basis? It matters because it's whether the occupier acted reasonably, ie you had notice that you need to move your car. However the occupier still has to act reasonably.
                              The car was parked SORN for 3 months before the incident happened.

                              I'm still a bit baffled as to why I'd need to move my car anyway - I could understand it if it was a request from the landlord (i.e. the property owner) but this was (effectively) the tenant in a neighbouring flat?

                              The irony is that if they'd have asked & given me enough time, or at least waited for me to come home I would have willingly moved the car... I had no beef with them at that point...

                              Thanks again for all your help & apologies if I sound a bit frustrated with it all - I'm trying my best not to and to accept free advice in the spirit in which it's offered... It really is appreciated... I only wish I'd looked into it in more depth earlier...

                              ATB

                              JulianS
                              Last edited by JulianS; 6th February 2016, 14:56:PM.

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X