• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

intestacy inheritance

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • intestacy inheritance

    I am one of three brothers. Mother died in 2008 and left the family home to the eldest brother who was single and remained so until he too died in 2013 . This left myself and one older brother. We inherited the property through intestacy . I have been told that the property would be on a joint tenancy basis. Unfortunately the said property was never registered with the land registry until I myself registered it. Further to this my second brother died in 2014 , before the registration was completed and was in my name only. My sister-in-law claims that half the proceeds should be hers but I disagree. Apart form the fact that under a joint tenancy the surviving owner has the whole of the property or proceeds , my brother and I had an agreement that should one survive the other , he takes all . An agreement she was a party to but now vehemently denies any knowledge of. Can anyone clarify this situation for me please.?
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: intestacy inheritance

    I have been told that the property would be on a joint tenancy basis.
    This seems to be the crucial question - who told you this?

    Unfortunately the said property was never registered with the land registry until I myself registered it. Further to this my second brother died in 2014 , before the registration was completed and was in my name only.
    I am not sure that registration makes any difference to legal ownership.

    my brother and I had an agreement that should one survive the other , he takes all . An agreement she was a party to but now vehemently denies any knowledge of.
    Was this agreement in writing? Did your brother leave a Will?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: intestacy inheritance

      the info about joint tenancy was given by a retired barrister. the agreement was unfortunately verbal , which is why my sister -in-law has the opportunity to deny its existence.the share of the property was not mentioned in his will.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: intestacy inheritance

        the info about joint tenancy was given by a retired barrister
        OK, I am not saying this is wrong, just that I have no knowledge of this. I think you do need to get legal advice on this from a solicitor who specialises in probate / inheritance unless [MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION], [MENTION=2]Celestine[/MENTION] or one of the other lawyers here is familiar with this area?

        the agreement was unfortunately verbal , which is why my sister -in-law has the opportunity to deny its existence.the share of the property was not mentioned in his will.
        An oral agreement will not over-ride a Will. It doesn't matter if you SiL denies its existence or not, the executors will have to follow what is written in the Will.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: intestacy inheritance

          You don't mention if your last brother left a will or not.
          From your post I'm guessing not.
          If you take Debt Camel's advice and consult a solicitor do be very aware of the high cost of contentious probate.
          It can soon swallow up a great portion of the estates assets, and it might be worth while negotiating with sil

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: intestacy inheritance

            second brother left a will but the property was not mentioned in it. the property is registered in my name only as he passed away before completion.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: intestacy inheritance

              second brother left a will but the property was not mentioned in it.
              There would normally be a residuary estate clause in a will which says that anything not specifically mentioned should be left to X.

              the property is registered in my name only as he passed away before completion.
              I think that is probably irrelevant.

              I think you need proper legal advice on your situation - not what some retired barrister said to you, not what someone on an internet forum says. I am not a lawyer and what I have said here is not legal advice.

              Depending on what that advice is, you will be in a better position to come to a compromise arrangement with your SiL. As [MENTION=39710]des8[/MENTION] says, contentious probate litigation is very expensive - if you can't come to an agreement, the lawyers may be the only people that end up the winners.

              Comment

              View our Terms and Conditions

              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
              Working...
              X