Re: Excess mileage charge
Well the choice is yours really, you can go to the ombudsman, they will get charged £500 for the privilege anyway so its not cost effective but the choice is yours.
BMW seem to be relying on a contractual term but as I've said previously, s.173 CCA states that if a contractual term is inconsistent with the rights of a consumer then it is void. Whilst the Donnelly case is not exact or relates to a VT, it is a CCA case and is therefore relevant. The did comment that a person's liability is restricted to one-half where they invoke s.99. The defendant in the case did not as it was the creditor but the fact is that it was acknowledged that liability is limited under s.99 - something BMW have skirted around.
If you want to take it to the ombudsman I am happy to help with putting your complaint together, or if you want to just pay its up to you.
Well the choice is yours really, you can go to the ombudsman, they will get charged £500 for the privilege anyway so its not cost effective but the choice is yours.
BMW seem to be relying on a contractual term but as I've said previously, s.173 CCA states that if a contractual term is inconsistent with the rights of a consumer then it is void. Whilst the Donnelly case is not exact or relates to a VT, it is a CCA case and is therefore relevant. The did comment that a person's liability is restricted to one-half where they invoke s.99. The defendant in the case did not as it was the creditor but the fact is that it was acknowledged that liability is limited under s.99 - something BMW have skirted around.
If you want to take it to the ombudsman I am happy to help with putting your complaint together, or if you want to just pay its up to you.
Comment