• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

CCJ Iminent

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: CCJ Iminent

    Cheers @nemesis45
    Have put up a copy of the amended WS, with a few extras added. Would you be so kind as to let me have your thoughts.
    If this is ok I will send copy to Cohens first thing in the morning. I could get a copy hand delivered to the court tomorrow as well as I am passing anyway.

    IN THE ............. COUNTY COURT

    Due to the late disclosure of documents by the claimant,
    I ask the court to admit the following statement:-
    Claim No
    BETWEEN:
    HOIST PORTFOLIO 2 LTD – Claimant
    - and –
    -Defendant
    _________________________________
    AMENDED WITNESS STATEMENT OF: The Defendant
    _________________________________
    1. On the 27th November 2015, I received document (Claimants exhibit). This purports to be a true copy of the agreement relevant to this claim.

    2. The defendant avers that this document does not comply with the provisions of CCA 1974 and is unenforceable because it is illegible / not easily legible in all parts.

    3. The defendant also received a single printed set of terms and conditions for the above document. (Claimants exhibit)

    4. Any terms and conditions supplied with an agreement should include any amendments made to those terms and conditions for the duration of the account and at the very least should include a separate set of terms and conditions relevant at the close of the account.

    5. The defendant believes that the claimant has deliberately withheld documents from the defendant which were asked for as far back as June. A print date of 30th June 2015 can be seen at the top of (claimant exhibit) Transaction Summary.

    6. The defendant also believes the claimant is trying to mislead the Court with their Witness Statement Paragraph 9 “Furthermore the Defendant refers to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, however, section 78 only refers to running credit agreements in any event”

    7. It is correct that section 78 refers to running credit agreements, but to infer that this is not applicable to the defendant is wrong. The claim is for an alleged credit card debt, which is by definition, a running credit agreement.

    Statement of Truth

    I the defendant, believe the statement above is the truth to the best of my knowledge.


    Signed: ________________________________


    Dated:

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: CCJ Iminent

      @nemesis45

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: CCJ Iminent

        Originally posted by daidog View Post
        Cheers @nemesis45
        Have put up a copy of the amended WS, with a few extras added. Would you be so kind as to let me have your thoughts.
        If this is ok I will send copy to Cohens first thing in the morning. I could get a copy hand delivered to the court tomorrow as well as I am passing anyway.

        IN THE ............. COUNTY COURT

        Due to the late disclosure of documents by the claimant,
        I ask the court to admit the following statement:-
        Claim No
        BETWEEN:
        HOIST PORTFOLIO 2 LTD – Claimant
        - and –
        -Defendant
        _________________________________
        AMENDED WITNESS STATEMENT OF: The Defendant
        _________________________________
        1. On the 27th November 2015, I received document (Claimants exhibit). This purports to be a true copy of the agreement relevant to this claim.

        2. The defendant avers that this document does not comply with the provisions of CCA 1974 and is unenforceable because it is illegible / not easily legible in all parts.

        3. The defendant also received a single printed set of terms and conditions for the above document. (Claimants exhibit)

        4. Any terms and conditions supplied with an agreement should include any amendments made to those terms and conditions for the duration of the account and at the very least should include a separate set of terms and conditions relevant at the close of the account.

        5. The defendant believes that the claimant has deliberately withheld documents from the defendant which were asked for as far back as June. A print date of 30th June 2015 can be seen at the top of (claimant exhibit) Transaction Summary.

        6. The defendant also believes the claimant is trying to mislead the Court with their Witness Statement Paragraph 9 “Furthermore the Defendant refers to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, however, section 78 only refers to running credit agreements in any event”

        7. It is correct that section 78 refers to running credit agreements, but to infer that this is not applicable to the defendant is wrong. The claim is for an alleged credit card debt, which is by definition, a running credit agreement.

        Statement of Truth

        I the defendant, believe the statement above is the truth to the best of my knowledge.


        Signed: ________________________________


        Dated:
        That's fine Dai, just normal type no bold characters, if you can hand deliver all the better.

        nem

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X