Hi everyone i am new here, but desperately need your kind advice with a problem i have. The facts of the case is that in 2012 a ccj was entered in my default by Aktiv capital, for a loan i took out in 2001 and had defaulted in 2004, so a case was brought to court in 2012 and because i was out of the country at the time of the case, and was even unaware of the case, i couldnt attend and couldnt make any representation. When i came back to live in the address in 2013, i still did not know of any case againt me untill feb 2014, when i checked my credit file and saw that there was a ccj, and later found out from the court that it was from Aktiv capital. So about 21 days later and after reading reviews and comments from this site and others, i filed an application to the court for a set aside. And the hearing was set for June. In my application i said, i just knew of the ccj, because i was away from the country at the time, and presented evidence. And second that the claim itself is statute barred and should not have been heard in the court, and if the case is set aside i will successfully defend this in the court.
The representative from Aktiv capital sent me their witness statement and in it they include evidence of the cca for the loan, and evidence of service to my last known address, but then said i made a payment of £2 in Nov 2008, but could not provide an evidence to prove that i did, but only the statement that i did make a payment.
At the set aside hearing, the judge said i havent acted promptly by making application to set aside the case, and i pointed out to the court that it was only 21 days after i knew that i make the application, but he still refuse. And he also said that i do not have any prospect of successfully defending the case because the claimant make a statement that i paid £2 in Nov 2008 and that has defeated any SB claim, even though i pointed out to him that there was no proof of this payment but only their signed statement, which anybody can make, but the judge refuse said that the witness statement is enough proof of an evidence of payment. Which i still dont understand how???
My question is that, can i appeal this, and what is my chance of successfully appealling this case. I wasnt around at the time the case was brought to the court in 2012, and as soon as i became aware in feb 2014 i apply for a set aside, but is 21 days too long to do so? And why is my claim for statute barred not properly disproved by Aktiv capital, as they do not have any proof or evidence that i make the payment and did not present any proof to the court that i did, but only relied on the witness statement they made, which the judge bite on. Please can you folks tell me if this is right and what should i do, should i appeal or should i just leave it and succumb to these tyrannies. Thanks
The representative from Aktiv capital sent me their witness statement and in it they include evidence of the cca for the loan, and evidence of service to my last known address, but then said i made a payment of £2 in Nov 2008, but could not provide an evidence to prove that i did, but only the statement that i did make a payment.
At the set aside hearing, the judge said i havent acted promptly by making application to set aside the case, and i pointed out to the court that it was only 21 days after i knew that i make the application, but he still refuse. And he also said that i do not have any prospect of successfully defending the case because the claimant make a statement that i paid £2 in Nov 2008 and that has defeated any SB claim, even though i pointed out to him that there was no proof of this payment but only their signed statement, which anybody can make, but the judge refuse said that the witness statement is enough proof of an evidence of payment. Which i still dont understand how???
My question is that, can i appeal this, and what is my chance of successfully appealling this case. I wasnt around at the time the case was brought to the court in 2012, and as soon as i became aware in feb 2014 i apply for a set aside, but is 21 days too long to do so? And why is my claim for statute barred not properly disproved by Aktiv capital, as they do not have any proof or evidence that i make the payment and did not present any proof to the court that i did, but only relied on the witness statement they made, which the judge bite on. Please can you folks tell me if this is right and what should i do, should i appeal or should i just leave it and succumb to these tyrannies. Thanks
Comment