Tweet
Fundamental realities of Law
Understanding the fundamental principles of Constitutional Law is essential for anyone pursuing justice, or perhaps most often, protection from injustice. It’s a sad fact that most professionals in the ‘legal industry’ are ignorant when it come to our highest Law, and that includes far too many judges.Many of the issues discussed here take place within a very powerful ‘unreality bubble’.There’s a presumption, well mostly, of the legitimacy of the laws and processes that we are faced with in courts and by officials. The fact is however that much that is asserted as law is in fact legal fiction without lawful provenance.Such a state of affairs does not make challenging those presumptions easy for individuals who only have limited knowledge, resources and powers. The current legal and legislative establishment presents a formidable force to contend with. Just because they are formidable though does not mean that even more formidable forces are not gathering to meet the challenge. The elephant in the room is the unassailable truth.
A growing number of people know that the myths andfictions regarding governance, constitutional law and economics are beingperpetrated upon us by what is effectively a cartel, even though only partiallyaware of itself, of self serving presumption, over reaching its authority. The delicious irony is that they can be hoisted with their own petard. They hide behind the faux moral assertion that they represent 'law and order' when infact the opposite is true and more and more of us now know it.
The assertion of Parliamentary supremacy is a legal fiction promoted by politicians and their Ministry of Justice. It’s not Law. In the UK and the Queen’s realms it is the Law that has supremacy. Acts of Parliament are not Law per se, they are Bills and Statutes. The term statute law is a technical misnomer, more properly it should be statute legislation. Despite politicians, their place-men, familiars and the ignorantly acquiescent who assert the treason of parliamentarysupremacy, where statutes and Law are in conflict Law is always superior.Statutes depend on flowing legitimately from what is therefore the supremacy of Law. Actual Law, with a capital L, is Constitutional, being made Constitutional Instruments (1215, 1688 etc.), Case Law Precedentsand Common Law (also including Natural Law). The other fiction promoted by such treason is that we don’t have a written and codified constitution; we do, even if not within a convenient single document as the Americans have. Perhaps the greatest of our Constitutional Instruments is the fully intact, in force andunamended 1688 Declaration of Rights and its inferior and wholly unrepealedstatute, the 1689 Bill of Rights, consequential to the ‘Glorious Revolution’.They were not created in order to replace the Divine Right of Kings with aDivine Right of Politicians. Whilst senior members of the judiciary too oftenserve parliament and fail to uphold the rights of people according to Law weare by definition being ruled unlawfully and tyrannically, which is Treason.
Understanding the fundamental principles of Constitutional Law is essential for anyone pursuing justice, or perhaps most often, protection from injustice. It’s a sad fact that most professionals in the ‘legal industry’ are ignorant when it come to our highest Law, and that includes far too many judges.Many of the issues discussed here take place within a very powerful ‘unreality bubble’.There’s a presumption, well mostly, of the legitimacy of the laws and processes that we are faced with in courts and by officials. The fact is however that much that is asserted as law is in fact legal fiction without lawful provenance.Such a state of affairs does not make challenging those presumptions easy for individuals who only have limited knowledge, resources and powers. The current legal and legislative establishment presents a formidable force to contend with. Just because they are formidable though does not mean that even more formidable forces are not gathering to meet the challenge. The elephant in the room is the unassailable truth.
A growing number of people know that the myths andfictions regarding governance, constitutional law and economics are beingperpetrated upon us by what is effectively a cartel, even though only partiallyaware of itself, of self serving presumption, over reaching its authority. The delicious irony is that they can be hoisted with their own petard. They hide behind the faux moral assertion that they represent 'law and order' when infact the opposite is true and more and more of us now know it.
The assertion of Parliamentary supremacy is a legal fiction promoted by politicians and their Ministry of Justice. It’s not Law. In the UK and the Queen’s realms it is the Law that has supremacy. Acts of Parliament are not Law per se, they are Bills and Statutes. The term statute law is a technical misnomer, more properly it should be statute legislation. Despite politicians, their place-men, familiars and the ignorantly acquiescent who assert the treason of parliamentarysupremacy, where statutes and Law are in conflict Law is always superior.Statutes depend on flowing legitimately from what is therefore the supremacy of Law. Actual Law, with a capital L, is Constitutional, being made Constitutional Instruments (1215, 1688 etc.), Case Law Precedentsand Common Law (also including Natural Law). The other fiction promoted by such treason is that we don’t have a written and codified constitution; we do, even if not within a convenient single document as the Americans have. Perhaps the greatest of our Constitutional Instruments is the fully intact, in force andunamended 1688 Declaration of Rights and its inferior and wholly unrepealedstatute, the 1689 Bill of Rights, consequential to the ‘Glorious Revolution’.They were not created in order to replace the Divine Right of Kings with aDivine Right of Politicians. Whilst senior members of the judiciary too oftenserve parliament and fail to uphold the rights of people according to Law weare by definition being ruled unlawfully and tyrannically, which is Treason.
Comment