hello....here goes....hope someone can help,
i recently ended a 3 year tenancy through a letting agent, at the end of the tenancy the property was in good condition and my rent was always paid in full on time for the 3 years.
the tenancy was ended by the landlord as they wanted to sell the house.
after the tenancy ended i recieved a letter from my letting agency advising me due basically to cleaning costs (carpets, oven etc) which conveniently added up to the same figure as my deposit i would not get any of my deposit back. this letter stated my 'deposit' was called an advanced rental payment on my tenancy agreement.
i phoned numerous times to complain and dispute but the receptionist just kept saying she would get the boss to call me back. i went into the office but the boss wasnt available and never called me back.
when i moved to my new property my new agency protected my deposit through DPS (this was the first time i was aware of the schemes) so i looked into it.
turns out my previous deposit was not protected for the entire 3 year tenancy. i queried this with the letting agency and they said because it was an advanced rental payment on the T.A it did not need protecting.
i queried this with the DPS, citizens advice, my new agency and a free legal advice centre, all of whom confirmed that because the letting agency kept the money for non rental purposes it is a deposit and should have been protected.
the agency are not registered with the poperty ombudsman or the association of landlords and letting agencies to place a formal complaint or dispute my deposit.
i followed procedure, wrote to the agent to dispute the deposit and threatened court action, all i got back was a text message basically fobbing me off, so i started small claims court action.
the process was going smoothly and i had been confident that i am in the right,so when it goes to court i would at least get my deposit back and hopefully claim the 3x deposit penalty for none protection of the deposit.
today however i received a 'general form of judgement' from the court ordering that 'UNLESS THE CLAIMANT FILES COPY OF TENANCY AGREEMENT BY 9 OCTOBER 2012 THE CLAIM WILL BE STRUCK OUT.'
i do not have the tenancy agreement and have not thought it important as i am not disputing that the agreement states my 'deposit' is an advanced rental payment, my claim even states this in my summary, i am disputing that now they have retained it for none rental reasons, it has by definition become a deposit. after all if an agency is allowed to just simply call the deposit by another name on the T.A it would mean every landlord could avoid using DPS simply by calling a deposit an 'advanced rental payment', or 'a stick of rhubarb payment' or anything they want.
i am now concerned that even if i can get the agreement to the court in the 5 days the judge has given me, or alternatively not sending the agreement will both result my claim being struck out without even being heard.
can i contact the court to explain this and emphasise i am not disputing what it says on the T.A?
and if so, how do i contact them? is there a phone number for such matters or do i write to them?
or if not, is there anything else i can do to ensure the claim makes it to court without being struck out?
i put on my allocation questionnaire i would be willing to use a court mediator but have heard nothing about it?
if i get struck out, could i change my claim to just dispute the withholding of my 'advanced rental payment' money as opposed to claiming for none protection of the deposit, or would i need to begin a brand new claim for this?
please please help as i feel very much like a massive underdog here and do not know where i stand or what to do next.
many many thanks
G
i recently ended a 3 year tenancy through a letting agent, at the end of the tenancy the property was in good condition and my rent was always paid in full on time for the 3 years.
the tenancy was ended by the landlord as they wanted to sell the house.
after the tenancy ended i recieved a letter from my letting agency advising me due basically to cleaning costs (carpets, oven etc) which conveniently added up to the same figure as my deposit i would not get any of my deposit back. this letter stated my 'deposit' was called an advanced rental payment on my tenancy agreement.
i phoned numerous times to complain and dispute but the receptionist just kept saying she would get the boss to call me back. i went into the office but the boss wasnt available and never called me back.
when i moved to my new property my new agency protected my deposit through DPS (this was the first time i was aware of the schemes) so i looked into it.
turns out my previous deposit was not protected for the entire 3 year tenancy. i queried this with the letting agency and they said because it was an advanced rental payment on the T.A it did not need protecting.
i queried this with the DPS, citizens advice, my new agency and a free legal advice centre, all of whom confirmed that because the letting agency kept the money for non rental purposes it is a deposit and should have been protected.
the agency are not registered with the poperty ombudsman or the association of landlords and letting agencies to place a formal complaint or dispute my deposit.
i followed procedure, wrote to the agent to dispute the deposit and threatened court action, all i got back was a text message basically fobbing me off, so i started small claims court action.
the process was going smoothly and i had been confident that i am in the right,so when it goes to court i would at least get my deposit back and hopefully claim the 3x deposit penalty for none protection of the deposit.
today however i received a 'general form of judgement' from the court ordering that 'UNLESS THE CLAIMANT FILES COPY OF TENANCY AGREEMENT BY 9 OCTOBER 2012 THE CLAIM WILL BE STRUCK OUT.'
i do not have the tenancy agreement and have not thought it important as i am not disputing that the agreement states my 'deposit' is an advanced rental payment, my claim even states this in my summary, i am disputing that now they have retained it for none rental reasons, it has by definition become a deposit. after all if an agency is allowed to just simply call the deposit by another name on the T.A it would mean every landlord could avoid using DPS simply by calling a deposit an 'advanced rental payment', or 'a stick of rhubarb payment' or anything they want.
i am now concerned that even if i can get the agreement to the court in the 5 days the judge has given me, or alternatively not sending the agreement will both result my claim being struck out without even being heard.
can i contact the court to explain this and emphasise i am not disputing what it says on the T.A?
and if so, how do i contact them? is there a phone number for such matters or do i write to them?
or if not, is there anything else i can do to ensure the claim makes it to court without being struck out?
i put on my allocation questionnaire i would be willing to use a court mediator but have heard nothing about it?
if i get struck out, could i change my claim to just dispute the withholding of my 'advanced rental payment' money as opposed to claiming for none protection of the deposit, or would i need to begin a brand new claim for this?
please please help as i feel very much like a massive underdog here and do not know where i stand or what to do next.
many many thanks
G
Comment