We all have had it done to us.... We are not in or at work and the parcel you ordered from the internet shop or auction site has been delivered. You get home all excited to open your new purchase and there is NO parcel. So you diligently track n trace the number down to see a ridiculous photo (often blurred) of your parcel on an anonymous door step, no house number / no person who accepted your parcel in the photo etc. - in effect totally useless information can be gathered from this picture.
The courier service and even the Royal Mail think these useless photo is perfectly adequate as "proof of delivery" and push the onus back to the sender ( they say the contract is with them and not the recipient), when clearly the responsibility rests with them delivering the parcel. The sender passed the parcel over to them (duty of care of the package), paid for the the service, and expect to have it delivered to the correct address on the package in a timely manner.
I am just curious to know is anyone has challenged this in a court of law? (Please don't quote the usual BS about GDPR etc. persons face in the picture etc... I have heard and read it all before. )
TIA
The courier service and even the Royal Mail think these useless photo is perfectly adequate as "proof of delivery" and push the onus back to the sender ( they say the contract is with them and not the recipient), when clearly the responsibility rests with them delivering the parcel. The sender passed the parcel over to them (duty of care of the package), paid for the the service, and expect to have it delivered to the correct address on the package in a timely manner.
I am just curious to know is anyone has challenged this in a court of law? (Please don't quote the usual BS about GDPR etc. persons face in the picture etc... I have heard and read it all before. )
TIA
Comment