Tweet
Hi
In a related case that I have commented on via this forum, the defendant has very obviously lied and repeatedly tried to argue the same points, clearly abusing the courts processes and despite being told he has no prospect of success re an appeal during the bankruptcy hearing then proceeded to make an appeal to the higher courts. He then lost this appeal and is now requesting an oral reconsideration hearing. This is so clearly an abuse of process especially considering the fact he has introduced totally contradictory statements from his initial sworn statement.
are the courts duty bound to address this situation because being quite frank if his lies and repeated appeals had been addressed we wouldn’t be in the lengthy and expensive situation that has been allowed to occur by the courts
In a related case that I have commented on via this forum, the defendant has very obviously lied and repeatedly tried to argue the same points, clearly abusing the courts processes and despite being told he has no prospect of success re an appeal during the bankruptcy hearing then proceeded to make an appeal to the higher courts. He then lost this appeal and is now requesting an oral reconsideration hearing. This is so clearly an abuse of process especially considering the fact he has introduced totally contradictory statements from his initial sworn statement.
are the courts duty bound to address this situation because being quite frank if his lies and repeated appeals had been addressed we wouldn’t be in the lengthy and expensive situation that has been allowed to occur by the courts
Comment